Jump to content
IGNORED

Conway out for unknown period


Unan

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, spudski said:

Listening to the interview with NP he mentions changing formation. Also Sykes as a wide player and for some reason mentions Naismith started as a winger. 

I'm fearing some odd positional choices against Brum.

I heard that as a bit of mine games to keep Birmingham guessing.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, spudski said:

Listening to the interview with NP he mentions changing formation. Also Sykes as a wide player and for some reason mentions Naismith started as a winger. 

I'm fearing some odd positional choices against Brum.

I don't think Kal has played there since his early twenties, hoping it is indeed a decoy ?

Wouldn't mind seeing Scotty push into number 10 behind Antoine and Nahki with Naismith, Williams and James behind should we go with the back 4.

Or maybe Antoine and Mark Sykes in wider roles and Wells spearheading

Edited by footie
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, spudski said:

Listening to the interview with NP he mentions changing formation. Also Sykes as a wide player and for some reason mentions Naismith started as a winger. 

I'm fearing some odd positional choices against Brum.

I feel perhaps Naismith will go to left back?

Max,

Tanner, Vyner, Atkinson, Naismith

Skyes, James, Scott, Williams, Pring

Wells

Just a guess?

  • Thanks 1
  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, spudski said:

Listening to the interview with NP he mentions changing formation. Also Sykes as a wide player and for some reason mentions Naismith started as a winger. 

I'm fearing some odd positional choices against Brum.

Sykes featured as a “10” yesterday & if you look at his positional stats for Oxford last season, he played all over the pitch (rarely at RWB!) but the majority were as a right sided midfielder.

Not convinced he’ll start the game but that is certainly an option, scored 8 times as well..

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Selred said:

I feel perhaps Naismith will go to left back?

Max,

Tanner, Vyner, Atkinson, Naismith

Skyes, James, Scott, Williams, Pring

Wells

Just a guess?

You don’t think in the absence of Weimann & Conway the bloke who has scored our last two goals will start?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gutted for Tommy and our relegation battle if out for a long period, means Semenyo offer would have more than what we would have accepted last week. 

On the positive the window is still open for a couple of weeks, means we may need to sell Alex and get some reinforcements.

Also goes to show, the risk of not cashing in on star players, you never know what injury can be around the corner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Selred said:

Honestly forgot about Semenyo! Yep take out Williams, put him in. 4,4,2. 

No worries!

I reckon it will be either Sykes or Williams plus Wells coming in for the two injured players, so:

O’Leary

Tanner Vyner Atkinson Naismith Pring

James Scott Sykes/Williams 

Semenyo Wells

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, spudski said:

Listening to the interview with NP he mentions changing formation. Also Sykes as a wide player and for some reason mentions Naismith started as a winger. 

I'm fearing some odd positional choices against Brum.

The big dilemma for OTIB:

- is playing Naismith as a winger a case of square peg in round hole

Answer:

- if we win it won’t get mentioned

- if we lose it will be a ridiculous decision.

(obviously ignoring the fact that most if his career was as a wide man)

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Davefevs said:

The big dilemma for OTIB:

- is playing Naismith as a winger a case of square peg in round hole

Answer:

- if we win it won’t get mentioned

- if we lose it will be a ridiculous decision.

(obviously ignoring the fact that most if his career was as a wide man)

I'll call it now, 3 days before the game.

It would be a pathetic ridiculous decision to shoe horn him in the side there.

If he's not good enough to get in the team in his normal position, bench him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Malago said:

Opportunity knocks for Sam Bell.

Possibly - but not sure a relegation battle with the kind of atmosphere we have seen at the last few home games will be beneficial to his development but I guess some young pros sink or swim.

We must be looking at the loan market at the very least for a forward, despite Pearson not liking to use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Selred said:

I feel perhaps Naismith will go to left back?

Max,

Tanner, Vyner, Atkinson, Naismith

Skyes, James, Scott, Williams, Pring

Wells

Just a guess?

I can see Semenyo going where you have Pring, and Naismith in for Williams there. With Pring going back to left back.

Basically the team that was for most part (Weimann injury, Naismith coming off for Williams) finished against Swansea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frenchred said:

I'll call it now, 3 days before the game.

It would be a pathetic ridiculous decision to shoe horn him in the side there.

If he's not good enough to get in the team in his normal position, bench him

Nobody is suggesting that.

Nobody (certainly not Nige) is suggesting playing him in a different position just to “give him a game”, they are saying he might play in a particular position for the benefit of the team overall, because of injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Malago said:

Opportunity knocks for Sam Bell.

I guess he's not ready for regular Championship football yet. If Martin is set to leave and Nigel doesn't want to use Weimann as a pure striker, we'll need a loan striker as reserve (Semenyo + Wells + ?).

Edited by Dan Robin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MC RISK77 said:

We must be looking at the loan market at the very least for a forward, despite Pearson not liking to use it.

I wonder if even the loan market is accessible without either:

a) Managing to offload some wages to fund it.

b) A player sale...we all know which candidates are likely there.

c) Parent club subsidising it greatly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...