Jump to content
IGNORED

What's changed?


harvey54

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, GrahamC said:

So you reckon QPR, 6 wins from 29 games are going to make up a 13 point gap & vastly inferior goal difference in their last 17 games?

Or Sheffield Wednesday? 15 points behind & an even worse goal difference?

Rotherham? 19 points behind & a worse goal difference still?

Want a £100 bet on it? Huddersfield (11 points behind, also a worse goal difference than us) won’t catch us, either.

Behave.

That's fair enough Graham but on current form, unless there's an improvement, we're on course for a 16th-19th finish which is below the majority (?) view of 10th-12th reflecting a modicum of success this campaign. 

Will the owner, JL & BT fess up to perhaps getting it wrong in their assessment of NP not getting the most out of a "top 6" squad? I think not!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Big C said:

The club is in a much better position now than under Pearson  shipping out dead wood and getting in players who will only improve

If it’s in a better position it’s because of NP. Who are the deadwood? As your later post suggests, Weimman,King,James etc. 

 So if NP had got rid of the “deadwood” who would he have replaced them with, given that his hands were tied in terms of finances? 
 

My last question, if NP could have “brought in players who could only improve”, what do you think might have happened there?

  • Thanks 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, W-S-M Seagull said:

I've posted a few times about how I'm worried we are going to let too much experience leave the building at once. 

I can see an argument for them all to leave on a playing perspective. However I see good value in retaining some of them because of their experience. Experience is something you can't coach. It's a vital ingredient in a squad of young players. 

It's something we missed under LJ. 

It's odd...but as weeks have gone by, it's feeling more and more like LJs Tenure here..

Fans more divided again. More uncertainty. No trust in the top. Questionable tactics etc. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, spudski said:

It's odd...but as weeks have gone by, it's feeling more and more like LJs Tenure here..

Fans more divided again. More uncertainty. No trust in the top. Questionable tactics etc. 

Spot on,

Just to add, refusing to make changes or change tactics when it's obvious to almost everyone it isn't working

But can get a cup run

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, spudski said:

It's odd...but as weeks have gone by, it's feeling more and more like LJs Tenure here..

Fans more divided again. More uncertainty. No trust in the top. Questionable tactics etc. 

I agree with this

Our fanbase was Definitely divided by LJ, then we seemed to be more united under NP as you could see he was slowly turning the ship around and progress was being made, while bringing through some very talented youngsters.

Now we seem to be divided again.

I think the main reason for this is the reasons given by the board as to why NP was sacked and the expectations put upon the new 'relatively untried' manager

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, headhunter said:

That's fair enough Graham but on current form, unless there's an improvement, we're on course for a 16th-19th finish which is below the majority (?) view of 10th-12th reflecting a modicum of success this campaign. 

Will the owner, JL & BT fess up to perhaps getting it wrong in their assessment of NP not getting the most out of a "top 6" squad? I think not!

Exactly, the reason given for replacing Nige was that he wasn’t getting the most out of the squad at his disposal, &  the new guy would this season. Now all of a sudden it’s, well what do you expect he’s not got his own players, and wait till next season, when he will have had the opportunity to have a pre season. The suits are already trying to change the narrative.

Edited by Ashtongreight
  • Like 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Big C said:

it was Pearson who wouldn't play him there

Cant have dead wood leading the line surely.

What you saying, hes dead wood because of Pearson, or the manager who sanctioned his exit?

I saw a wholehearted player who gave his best wherever he played, who might help his club to the prem.

Please give it a rest.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Natchfever said:

Cant have dead wood leading the line surely.

What you saying, hes dead wood because of Pearson, or the manager who sanctioned his exit?

I saw a wholehearted player who gave his best wherever he played, who might help his club to the prem.

Please give it a rest.

Hear Hear!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...