Superjack

We had.

It always has been under these clowns.

WHAT???!!! Like we were under the previous manager, Brian?? Get this **** gone.

Bristol Sport headphones, probably.

Well that's even more bullshit. He ****ed off to Spain for at least a few of them. Wish he'd bloody stayed there.

Nor are City.

That'll show 'em.

Quite right. Although why next season and not this? (Apart from the fact that it's your perogative, of course).

Maybe you should tell that to the owner.

The 'C' won't stand for 'City' tonight then..

Nor me. Do you honestly think that I want to be right about the Lansdowns being incompetent, egotistical, narcissistic w*****s, or Tinnion being a backstabbing snake in the grass, or Manning being so out of his depth he could rival the Titan submersible? No. I don't. But the evidence is there. For years in the case of the Lansdowns. So I am.

That wasn't the question you asked.

In that case, I hope it's October.

If you think that he is the sort of person that would do that (and even I don't), then why the **** are you even defending him??!!

He doesn't know what to do.

He will get a significant amount more. They want to keep him, despite results. That's the difference. I hate them. And I am not one to use that word lightly.

I agree. (time or money) Hopefully others are starting to as well.

Great post. I'm bored and tired of this club because of the owners, but I don't think that my viewpoint and yours are mutually exclusive. Edit: It's also very, very sad. And when this hierarchy honour 'legends' of the club - real ones, not the likes of Tinnion, they maybe should cast a thought towards what those legends might privately think of the way that the club is currently run.

Well, just as we can't make him go, he can't just say "**** this, I'm off" (although mentally I think he already has). He needs a buyer. And that buyer... is who.

If he sets up to play counter-attack, then fair enough. If the players are forced to adapt to it (because by his own admission he can't really affect anything 'in game'), then that is not anything that he should take credit for. Granted, it's not always easy to make the distinction, but I have a more than strong feeling that most of his previous good results have come via the latter.

All true. But, as I said, I suspect that we will be forced to counter-attack. The mood hoover doesn't like that. So if we get a result doing it, the credit should go to a bloke with his feet/crutches up in North Somerset or Devon.

If you want unity (or close to it), you should ask the 'board' why they sacked the previous manager.

On his phone games? No idea. We sacked the medical bloke that could have.

Because Manning is more 'not the man' than other 'not the men' might be.

Well they will come at us. So the players will likely revert to Pearson's instructions. We might win.