Natchfever

37 minutes ago, Rudolf Hucker said:

We are indeed blessed that one of the most brilliant minds on the planet inhabited this forum last evening and admitted that despite possessing the brainpower of a small planet, he cannot understand why  "anyone in our 'metropolis' would want to support anyone other than Rovers".

My mind is blown.

 

 

I didn't even know Bristol was considered a metropolis. 6 or 7 metropolitan areas in the UK and we aint one of them. But of course St Andrews gas leak knows that and was just having fun with they gurt thick teds.

12 hours ago, st andrews gas said:

Am happy to show you my certificate anytime/anywhere of your choosing- and my commendations from  several Japanese  government ministries...

Japanese government, the infamous land grabbers of the 20th century, I can see why they would commend a methane snorter.

12 hours ago, steviestevieneville said:

 got the brass neck to call me a keyboard warrior after some of the comments you’ve made. It’s like conversing with a ten year old . If you want to come on here with a pathetic attempt at a wind up then at least try to show some level of intelligence . I’m pointing out facts about your club that you should be embarrassed about boy. It shows the levels of your delusions of grandeur that would come on our forum trying a pathic attempt at a wind up when the reality is you are closer to forest green as a club that you are to us in infrastructure . 

They are actually closer to College Green in infrastructure when those hippies put the tents up and pissed in doorways

OK which one of you is "ipgas" - on asschat talking about Barnet :

It's all covered, apart from the home end it is all seated. It has bars in every stand.  It has a fitness centre and it has a restaurant, as well as a number of 3G pitches and a car park.

I think those facilities outweigh open terraces, tents and food cabins

9 hours ago, The Truth said:

Well, they havnt had a book published by a hooligan 

Yes they have.

11 hours ago, Cheesleysmate said:

Definitely a bloke and ex player of Bristol Rovers. I doubt it is the real Miah Dennehy though.

Yep Miam as in Jeremiah.

30 minutes ago, st andrews gas said:

Fair comments..wasn't having 'a pop' per se, but the fool O'Hanahan needed answering..it of course, is not my house to get in order- but I agree with that which you say regarding our owners- thought I had made it clear enough- will try and use a more simplistic lingustic approach in future...

Use whatever words you like, just make sure they have the correct meaning though.

13 minutes ago, Vincent Vega said:

You do know siblings are your brother or sister not your children you thick sag belter 

Beat me to it mate 

1 hour ago, ZiderEyed said:

For any sad gas**** currently reading this, I cordially invite you to stop being such a coward and sign up to the forum. Discuss your vile club with us.

Why invite those ***** on here? Sorry to piss on your cornflakes ZE but im not sure you speak for everyone. I dont need them to help form my opinion of that crock of shite.

21 minutes ago, Rich said:

He was a hero in Geoff Dunford's eyes. That's why he gave him the honour of vice president of the football club, for services to the football club, while "acting" as Chairman of the rugby club. He said so in his Obituary, which for some reason went into great detail about finances, rather than the man, which I for one, thought, rather a strange thing to do.

Hell of a coincidence wasnt it Rich. Ground stealing vermin tried to take AG too.

52 minutes ago, Miah Dennehy said:

It really hasn't. It was awful to start with and only got mildly better in the first few years, but once the rugby went it improved drastically

You have no shame do you. Arthur ******* Holmes should be your hero rather than Dean Windass. Cuckoos.

Ok you gas *****. I am obsessed with methane snorters just like my missus wont miss big brother. Its full of useless self publicising pricks with zero talent but cant help laughing at attempts to dig themselves out of forgettable mediocracy by whatever shameless means they think are available.

13 minutes ago, 1960maaan said:

That's a bare face lie , and libellous comment , one of the fires was an accident 

Hmm.....

3 hours ago, Nick Wilde said:

http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/threads/city-v-bristol-city-1st-leg-post-match.332454/page-57

 

Wow Gas go marching in what a sad individual.

Hark at those few Manc belters joining in mind..

5 minutes ago, Monkeh said:

the asset stripping begins 

Do they even own it ?

10 hours ago, 1960maaan said:

 

Yep , interesting use of stats. Technically @Ska Junkie that is Div 3 South so to prove a point they'll ignore those. Also putting in their highest average is 13,026 is funny as , although it might be true, they haven't averaged 10,000+ for 40 years and only 4 times in the last 50 have they managed above 10k in L1 add 2nd tier and that goes up another 2. I think 15k ground will be plenty for them, all they need is a rich benefactor to fund it all.
 

Have we really only had a highest third tier average of 12000 odd ?

5 hours ago, Bar BS3 said:

UWE is a great location for a modern sports stadium, with good corporate & conference facilities, no doubt about it. 

However, who is going to invest huge amounts on building something on land that will never belong to them..?

I’m surprised that UWE haven’t gone down the route of obtaining funding for a multi sport venue, that could be rented to Rovers. Although that would not help Rovers overall because non matchday revenue would go to UWE. 

I think it would be splendid if a well known local billionaire built a 10,000 seat indoor arena there. Could house Bristol Flyers and Uni teams and both parties could share the revenue from concerts and exhibitions etc.

It would also of course **** over the blue few as they wouldn't be able to do their usual cuckoo stunt...

10 minutes ago, Bar BS3 said:

 

But aren’t “they” paying him interest from the money taken against the charge..? Effectively borrowing more money to pay interest on the monies already borrowed, all stacking up against the ground..?

My thoughts are that when the money taken against the charge runs out they are ****** unless they can raise cash via a January sale of their talented squad members.

1 hour ago, BrightCiderLife said:

I've seen a few posts in which people say that WAQ's charge over the Mem means NLBRFC2015 either don't own it or that it's value has been reduced. Neither is wrong exactly, but also neither is an accurate description of the effect of a charge.

Essentially, it works the same as a mortgage. The charge doesn't change who owns the land. However, if it is sold, the charge holder (WAQ/Dwayne Sports) gets paid first. We're told the charge is to cover the £10m loan meaning the charge holder gets the first £10m of any sum paid to buy the ground. It does not devalue the property. Same as if you sell a house with a mortgage, the bank gets its cut first, and you get whatever is left (proceeds of sale). 

It is, however, unlikely the ground would be sold. If the club is sold, WAQ/DS will be bought out and their loan repaid, meaning the charge will be removed. The new owners can then charge or sell their new asset as they wish. 

The charge doesn't change who owns the Mem or its value, except that in effect, the charge holder 'owns' the first £10m and so the value to the seller (not the buyer) is reduced by the same amount. 

Using the mortgage analogy presumably if they default on interest payments it opens the door for the lender to take ownership of the borrowers assets?

38 minutes ago, Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan said:

I think the Emirates Stadium is only 60k, Old Trafford is 75k.

How big a club do these deluded idiots think they’re going to be??

Dortmund obviously. Club of the people. The blue and white quartered wall, the Horfield experience....

6 minutes ago, Red34 said:

It really is the level of delusion...  They're discussing how it'd be nice if stadiums can be upgraded to 80k if they reached the Champions League:

http://gaschat.co.uk/thread/11049/on-scenes?page=16

I mean we're a lot closer to it and I still don't think I'll see the day City are regularly playing in the Champions League.  It'd be really, really nice and I wish it would happen, but I'm realistic enough to realise it's probably not!

Surely another one of ours - just checked the persons odd monicker and its Welsh for "incompetence" 

3 hours ago, Monkeh said:

not a clever enough user name to be one of us

I like the 82 er bit mind.

2 minutes ago, bert tann said:

Peg, my proposal was for Stephen Lansdown to consider funding a trust set up to purchase the Mem under the assets of community value scheme. As part of this deal Rovers would essentially become a fan owned club using the Bundesliga model and would lease the stadium from the Trust. The financial structure of "new Rovers" would mean we would not be a direct threat to City in spending terms but we would provide some competition, we would preserve a Bristol sporting institution and the Mem would be saved as a sporting venue and community asset.

The alternative is for the Mem to be sold for commercial development and for Dwane Sports to potentially make a profit from their involvement with Rovers. The assets of community value scheme cannot prevent them selling the land to the highest bidder but imagine the pressure which Bristolians, in a united front, could exert on them  to sell to the Trust for the £10 million they are owed and walk away.

   

The alternative would be for a sporting institution despised by many City fans who remember the underhand attempts to steal our ground in 82, and opposed the world cup bid, then shafted a true sporting institution (Bristol Rugby) to the extent that it has still not recovered, to be allowed to crash and burn.

Rovers didn't give one f uck about the Mem being preserved when it thought they had a deal with Sainsbury's.

I don't personally want competition in the city. Leeds and Newcastle seem to manage ok without it.

City would gain nothing from helping you lot out Bert, and it does you no credit banging the drum on this subject on a forum that tolerates gasheads and actually welcomes you personally.

I  have many Gas friends but nothing would would please me more than for Rovers to disappear - and they feel exactly the same in reverse.

Let it rest mate.

12 minutes ago, RedRaw said:

 

So, a realist in one post and back to the standard sag delusional state in the next.........

Not sure, he did say **** The Gas didn't he?

1 hour ago, Cheesleysmate said:

Just imagine if this were actually true?! What an absolutely bunch of ruthless ***** that would make Wally & Co!! The destroyed Sags wouldn't be able to go all Tote End Aggro over it either because they would have all ****** off back to Jordan. Surely that would make the Al-Qadi family the greatest bunch of honorary Teds that ever lived?!!

Agent Wally.