Jump to content

frenchred

OTIB Supporter
  • Posts

    4045
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by frenchred

  1. 3 hours ago, Curr Avon said:

    Ian, Mark, Dave Fevs join DaveP in a review of a game which on balance City just about deserved to win but due to a MOL error they had to settle for a share of the spoils.

    Taking this game in isolation then a point against a team unbeaten in 11 games should be considered a good thing but City's form has slumped in the league to the extent that it is now just 3 points out of a possible 15 with no easy games on the horizon.

     

    A work in progress, for how ******* long,!

    We were told boring ball was being brought in to get more out of the squad we have, he isn't, in fact he's taking us backwards

    How you all roll over and tickle his belly is unbelievable, you really are the worms that turned 

    • Like 2
  2. 13 minutes ago, Bedred31 said:

    Dire ITV from Anfield. Relentlessly disrespectful to Norwich. Just replayed both Liverpool goals while referring to a Norwich goal ‘sandwiched between’ ( ie an equaliser). While telling us all that the only ball we’re interested in during the draw is Maidstone’s. Frankly sick of this tabloid style- look for the story and plug nothing else style of coverage. 

    Well they are shite!

  3. 1 hour ago, formerly known as ivan said:

    Of course it’s unprofessional! They pay his wages, how can he refuse to play.

    The only Sunderland fans who will agree with him are those who still believe they are a big club and have a right to be in the premier league. They have been petty ever since Beale was appointed. 

    Manning had mixed reviews when joining us but Sunderland were embarrassing about Beale.

    Thats a helluva pair of rose tinters you must have

  4. 4 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    anyone else hear him announce that this is Ashton Gate for the 5th round of the FA Cup, just prior to kick off?

    The irony that he got something wrong while you spell his name like that!

  5. 29 minutes ago, wayne allisons tongues said:

    Peter Wright is still number 8 in the world. Danny Noppert should be a bit aggrieved twice now he’s been ignored as world number 7. Going on rankings Noppert should be in instead of Luke Littler.

    It's probably a difficult task trying to balance it all out, couldn't really go without littler, he's single handily put darts on front and back pages of papers! Agree about Noppert though

  6. Just now, Cole Not Gas said:

    Some very humorous guys on the Forest forum so worth a look if you get the chance. A few things i picked up; they think our fans are 'nuts' from the days they found their Amici was no longer serving coffee and from when they thought Ashton Park was a nice place for a post-match stroll!. How times have changed with all the love and dove we now have; a full house at BS3 again (thanks Liam), 15% off drinks in a fantastic stadium (thanks Steve) and the chance of an FA Cup run.

    I know this isn't all negative about our club so expect some typical comments but;...we are so fortunate not to be a Blackpool, Bury, Bristol Rovers, Charlton, Derby, Sheff Wednesday, Reading, etc 

    Cant wait for tomorrow, Come on City

    Your next sentence should be: Be careful what you wish for!

    People like you are part of the reason this club has not progressed 

    • Like 5
    • Haha 3
    • Confused 5
    • Sad 2
  7. 4 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

    I’m not sure how to answer that Neil.

    I don’t see Twine as “key man dependency” and I certainly didn’t Eliasson either (I’ll leave it at that!!).  Re Twine, if he is going to become important as you’re hypothesising, I’d seriously question our head-coach and his ability to create a team / coach what he has.  That would be a terrible indictment imho.  A good coach would coach the team to take advantage of overloading a single player.

    Thats maybe not what you’re suggesting.  But it would suggest that the hierarchy didn’t really understand what they were getting.

    The bit in bold would be no surprise at all!

  8. 2 hours ago, Davefevs said:

    It is seen as a negative from a new investment / ownership perspective.  Couple that with BCC Planning, and that’s a double-whammy, should any new owner want to expand it.

    I get that but it hasn't hindered other clubs getting investment really has it?

    Why do we need bigger when we only sell out for "glamour" cup ties against prem teams when tickets are around a third/quarter of full prices

    Normally there are 4-5000 empty seats (more if you count actual attendance) at matches, we ain't selling them on a regular basis anytime soon!

    Of course if the promised land beckoned anytime soon it may be different but can't really see that and in any case other teams get by with smaller grounds

    • Hmmm 1
×
×
  • Create New...