1960maaan

Both goals taken well, but bloody hell there are some bad misses. Should have been 5 at least judging by that . They really didn't want to get to Wembley did they, sorry don't they spell it Wembely ?

Saying "file does not exist"

I don't think we need to change too much to start, sticking to the usual is possible. OLeary. Vyner - Atkinson - Naismith Sykes/Tanner - James - Williams - Pring - Scott - Semenyo - Wells Could easily switch to a 4-3-3 if needed . Very lightweight bench though.

Beat me to it Dave. As one door closes another one opens, just a little. A way to go for both, but as they say , the longest journey .... etc

Yeah, they normally take all precautions, so I imagine he will do a few 45 minutes with the kids & gradually build up to fitness. Been out so long it's unlikely they will rush him back.

The Justified Ancients of Mu Mu - It's Grim Up North

Split Enz - Six Months In A Leaky Boat

Lulu - Shout

AC/DC - Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap

I was told very early on that the Stadium (at the time there was no chatter of the extras ) was to be Steve's Legacy. I really don't think he went in looking for a profit, I mean how much money do you need ?

Apparently about 2 miles from the Ground. With the crowd and traffic might be tight , unless you know the way well. I've not done the station since the ground had been developed and would struggle to get my bearings, and the traffic can be shit so their recommendation of Taxi mayn't help.

Just looked and Hull and Cardiff are home, near us in the table and 10/3. Not a big difference, so 5 years without a Pen counts for nothing in the odds.

I've been told there is to be a physical link/walkway from the new arena/hotel to the Stadium. So I imagine the whole package would be held by Ashton Gate Ltd when completed, and I guess it would work on the same lines as the Stadium and City.

The Boo Radleys - Wake Up Boo!

Clause or not, if he has said he will not sign a new contract whatever, I see little benefit in him playing. I like him, but you may as well give Kadji minutes unless we are desperate. We have King, Williams, James, Scott even Naismith before you get to the kids or those that could "fill in". I think Pearson might have one eye on next year and HNM isn't a part of that.

I actually missed Atkinsons bad pass debating this. I really don't know the Laws now, slight changes that make what we have been brought up with completely wrong. Spurs disallowed goal before the World Cup, the ball went backwards to the scorer, but he was still offside. Looks days to understand that one. The offside from when he touches the ball is ridiculous IMO. Very few of the tweaks have made it easier for anyone but I think they will keep going until it works for VAR, which of course doesn't help the rest of the EFL.

Back when they were rivals we used to argue a lot, as you'd imagine. But constant replies like, "that's in the past" when we would say about a run of wins. While they would constantly try and remind us of any win they had had in the previous decade. As Graham said **** 'em

Well we disagree, partly, I don't think it's clear and that's why people disagree on here. He doesn't blow for the foul, and IMO starts to turn away. He does keep his eye on the incident but hasn't given a foul. There is a tangle and it is a foul by Scott, though they both seem at it, it's the non decision that causes the problem. That's why I said I'd love to see his report. My first post said that he could have been playing on but then pulled it back, but he neither signals advantage (as they normally do) or go to give the free kick against Scott. I don't know why we bother discussing decisions any more, specially ones that could be Pens.

He does, but the Ref didn't give the free kick. Their player is taking the ball away about 10 yards away from the area. No decision and no play on signal, that's why everyone is pissed off. If he is playing advantage, they still have the advantage and the reaction is surely a different stage of play, just an easy out to then pull it back. Really bad, unclear and muddled whatever the Ref is trying to do. They didn't lose their advantage as they still had the ball ,then their player barged Scott. I'm not sure what the correct decision but I would love to hear how the Ref saw it.

I just realised Was getting mixed up with the Naismith foul (definite booking) and the one the Ref stopped the game for the Swansea player having a knock to the back. Another baffling decision IMO, I thought we had the ball and he stopped play to give their keeper the ball.

Just watched these highlights , Semenyo & Atkinson look easy Pens to give and the only way I can explain the other one? The Ref saw a foul by us , played advantage then called it back to book the defender ..... But the Ref doesn't wave play on, he never points as though to give a free kick . Just books the defender and gives him the kick. Pathetic. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/football/64165605

Two incidents summed up how Referees go about their days work when Reffing us. The one above, where the injured player doesn't have to leave the pitch and the one where their player gets booked and gets a free kick. I'd love to see the assessors report and the refs reply, another letter incoming

I didn't know that, but I didn't think a foul was given let alone a card, as the ball was cleared and both teams played on. So I was wrong in my assumption, and the Ref was just plain wrong . ?

Commercial Rooms sell Blue Moon

Really, I thought it was. I do think that makes less of a difference than VAR potentially does, but this day and age and with the money sloshing around Football they should be able to do it throughout the League.