Jump to content

RedRaw

Members
  • Posts

    4185
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by RedRaw

  1. 4 minutes ago, phantom said:

    Never want to back the blue few but they are quoting someone else 

    But by quoting the bizzare statement, they are attempting to down play the alleged incident.

    Clearly something went on, someone witnessed someone grabbing the neck and kick to head, someone phoned the police, someone ended up with an injury, Barton has already used ‘alcohol’ and ‘exaggeration’ as an excuse.

    just because someone hasn’t formally made a claim of assault doesn’t mean it didn’t happen 

    • Like 1
  2. 12 minutes ago, PHILINFRANCE said:

    2. Look up the meaning of ‘Assault by Beating’, the offence with which JB has been charged.

    There is no suggestion or allegation that JB has beaten a woman, his wife or any other woman - apart from in The Sun and from some ill-informed posters on this thread.

    So would I, but I don’t think you need to worry.

    I consider it unlikely JB will be found guilty of ‘beating a woman’.

    Are you purposely ignoring every single media outlet, news broadcaster and internet site out there? 

    Are you purposely ignoring the fact he is in court tomorrow charged with assault by beating?

    https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-57960977.amp

    I’m beginning to think you’re defending the guy

  3. 3 minutes ago, PHILINFRANCE said:

    The only ‘fact’ at present is the Police statement, which refers to a charge of ‘Assault by Beating’ whereby an unnamed woman, i.e. by extension, not necessarily JB’s wife, suffered a head injury.

    My somewhat nonsensical concoction of the circumstances above was just that, i.e. nonsensical, but, à la Kevin Keegan, I would just love it to transpire in Court tomorrow that the unfortunate woman assaulted was anybody but Mrs B, and for both Mr and Mrs B to sue the above mentioned rags for libel. 

    so let me get this straight, you would love it tomorrow if it transpires that he beat another woman but not his wife and then sues media outlets?

    sorry mate, absolute bollocks from you. I suppose you think the Asda Spider-Man is admirable because he assaulted a woman that wasn’t his wife 

    • Like 4
  4. 1 hour ago, Dastardly and Muttley said:

    Simpson is welcome to a second chance in a non public eye, role. But as a role model for children and others, he shouldn’t be in the privileged position of being paid to play a game for a living.

     

    Completely warped logic. 

    slap your wife about and you’re a milkman, ok to go back to work

    slap your wife about and you’re a footballer, not ok to go back to work, change your profession and hope somebody gives you a chance 

    domestic abuse is the issue here not what job you do

    • Like 4
  5. 6 minutes ago, PHILINFRANCE said:

    Just for the record, I believe you may be jumping the gun and, with respect, suggest you may wish to reconsider, or even delete, your statement.

    Unless I am mistaken, JB has been charged with ‘Assault by Beating’ after a woman suffered a head injury.

    Nowhere, apart from on this thread and in an article in The Sun :nono:, have I seen it mentioned that the woman in question was JB’s wife.

    Quite a serious accusation to make without evidence.

    https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/joey-barton-charged-attacking-wife-24611037.amp
     

    https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/metro.co.uk/2021/07/25/joey-barton-charged-with-alleged-attack-on-his-wife-14985691/amp/

     

    As well as the Sun, at least two other outlets mention his wife. I have stated ‘alleged’. All other social media will be rife with rumour, conjecture and ‘alleged’ comments.

    With respect, everyone is jumping the gun at the moment and no doubt all will be revealed tomorrow.

    if the Mods thought what I stated was libellous, I’m sure they would have deleted it by now

  6. 3 minutes ago, Numero Uno said:

    In the same manner that if Danny Simpson laid a hand on his wife again and got convicted at court whilst employed by us he would also get sacked. Seems to be hard for a few to get their head round for some reason.

    Quite. The usual gas head tactic is to try and deflect anything they do with something we’ve done but looking at their thread, quite rightly, 95% are keeping on point.

    Disappointing to then come on our forum to see 1/2 trying to compare what is going on over there with the Simpson situation…..any excuse to have a got at our club it seems

    • Like 6
    • Flames 3
  7. 5 minutes ago, Dastardly and Muttley said:

    I suspect that, if he’s found guilty, their club will probably do the right thing and get rid.

    Sadly, I can’t say the same about our club after their support of Simpson.

     

    Completely different situations. 
     

    simpson was not a city player when the incident happened, went to court, sentenced, served his ‘sentence’, appears to have turned his life around and several years later signs for city

    Barton is the incumbent rovers manager, has a court case hanging over him, has a long history of violence, has allegedly attacked his wife and if found guilty should rightly be sacked

    • Like 14
  8. 7 minutes ago, Riaz said:

    Like? Who’s a crackpot?  Who i believe?

    You have provided various tweets from Dr Bossche who is seen as rather left field and many of his alarmist theories debunked here https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-critical-thinking-pseudoscience/doomsday-prophecy-dr-geert-vanden-bossche

    you have provided a screenshot from the light newspaper, an openly conspiracy theory led outlet that seems to think it has all the ‘facts’ and the ‘truth’

    you have suggested that David Icke has been right in many of his ramblings but have ignored my request to enlighten us on which ones

    As much as you can have your own opinion, you have shown yourself this afternoon to clearly believe very alternative, some might say ‘crackpot’, theories

     

  9. 13 minutes ago, Riaz said:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sage-93-minutes-coronavirus-covid-19-response-7-july-2021/sage-93-minutes-coronavirus-covid-19-response-7-july-2021
     

    Point 9, on the governments own website, alludes to the fact that mass vaccination, makes more variants more likely 

    Apparently that note was only put on there, after pressure from scientists 

    Isn’t that the case with all viruses? Mutation is a natural part of a virus’ lifecycle.

    are you suggesting that we shouldn’t have bothered with a vaccination programme and just let the virus rip through the world population?

  10. 1 minute ago, Riaz said:

    What, because i haven’t been scared into having a vaccine i don’t need? And most of us don’t need. 
     

    I think for myself and don’t trust the government and elites. Why would i. Most the time they try and **** us over.

    Many parts of the world don’t have running water or other basic needs. I bet these people that care so much, make sure they have the vaccine tho!

    But you’re happy to put your faith and quote ‘facts’ from an online, conspiracy theory, anti-vax outlet…..not really thinking for yourself I’d say

    foil hat tinfoil kevin GIF by The Tick

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...