Jump to content
IGNORED

Ward


GrahamC

Recommended Posts

not true... paid off, like most mangers nowadays its a years contract for pay off.... wardy would have been same , cheaper too keep him on as DOF

 

city still paying coppell, the jock and SOD.....

 

who knows what Clarke will do ....  wont be as dire as it has been under ward ...

you sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really think that Lansdown can sit back and relax about finances, owing to the fact that great hordes attend AG? Your smugness knows no bounds. Without Stephen Lansdown you would have no we.

How can you be snug knowing another man is paying the majority of your bills?

 

Why do you and others insist on there would be no club without Lansdown?? Total BS man, we were fine before he took the helm.

 

Somehow, some way the Gas will skank their way out of relegation...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i reckon we need to find out who grassed on agent ward,he was doing a sterling job taking them down, next up it will be clarkson shown the door,hes put in a valliant effort this season too,so close and yet so far to seeing them get stuffed at the hand stadium in a few years time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps Rovers are banking on the dead cat bounce that often happens with a new manager?

The supposed dead cat bounce won't happen, at least not at the Mem, the cat wont get a chance to bounce before some sag jumps the fence to bag said cat for the Sunday roast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really think that Lansdown can sit back and relax about finances, owing to the fact that great hordes attend AG? Your smugness knows no bounds. Without Stephen Lansdown you would have no we.

How can you be snug knowing another man is paying the majority of your bills?

Think youm barking up the wrong tree !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really think that Lansdown can sit back and relax about finances, owing to the fact that great hordes attend AG? Your smugness knows no bounds. Without Stephen Lansdown you would have no we.

How can you be snug knowing another man is paying the majority of your bills?

  

Good old typo's. The thing is, I enjoy football rivalry but wouldn't gloat over any club going out of business. There is no room for smuggnes, when without Stephen Lansdown's money, it could be City that easily join those already in financial difficulty.

Wouldn't we, without SL, have just bumbled along largely like we've always done? Probably got promoted from League One at some point (it happens, periodically), and then relegated a bit sooner, but without splashing out on England goalies and the like. Then just dawdled about again in League One until the stars aligned somehow, someone got enough things right, bit of momentum, and we limp over the line in second place back into the Championship. Where we might have one good year before falling out miserably again.

And around we go again. Not sure we NEED SL to do all this, we can manage it by ourselves

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you and others insist on there would be no club without Lansdown?? Total BS man, we were fine before he took the helm.

Somehow, some way the Gas will skank their way out of relegation...

I think you should look at gate receipts versus wages / transfer fees. Without Lansdown we would be struggling big time. Nevertheless, you carry on with your smug ownership delusions of BCFC. By the way, how much money do you have to put into BCFC by monday? Cab we rely on you to facilitate transfers, loans, wage bills?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't we, without SL, have just bumbled along largely like we've always done? Probably got promoted from League One at some point (it

happens, periodically), and then relegated a bit

sooner, but without splashing out on England

goalies and the like. Then just dawdled about

again in League One until the stars aligned

somehow, someone got enough things right, bit

of momentum, and we limp over the line in

second place back into the Championship.

Where we might have one good year before

falling out miserably again.

And around we go again. Not sure we NEED

SL to do all this, we can manage it by

ourselves

Let's see your money by monday. If you can step into Stephen Lansdown's shoes then obviously you are the man the club needs. How much money do you have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you should look at gate receipts versus wages / transfer fees. Without Lansdown we would be struggling big time. Nevertheless, you carry on with your smug ownership delusions of BCFC. By the way, how much money do you have to put into BCFC by monday? Cab we rely on you to facilitate transfers, loans, wage bills?

There is a valid argument that says the way the Investor has spent his own money is what has landed the club where it currently stands in any event!! So is he now funding his own mess that he created?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you should look at gate receipts versus wages / transfer fees. Without Lansdown we would be struggling big time. Nevertheless, you carry on with your smug ownership delusions of BCFC. By the way, how much money do you have to put into BCFC by monday? Cab we rely on you to facilitate transfers, loans, wage bills?

 

Based on Lansdowns spending over the years? think gate receipts/income to wages/transfer fees is desperately inbalanced hence why we were 40M in the hole... 18M spent on wages at one point as well but you keep thinking everything is hunky dory.

 

My point was that just before Lansdown took over, we weren't on the verge of extinction so how can you justify without him there would be no club? We certainly wouldn't have the debt he has accumulated for one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a valid argument that says the way the Investor has spent his own money is what has landed the club where it currently stands in any event!! So is he now funding his own mess that

he created?

Not valid at all. Where was your money to counter Lansdown's so called mess? Where is your consortium to put the club on the financial / successful path?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on Lansdowns spending over the years? think gate receipts/income to wages/transfer fees is desperately inbalanced hence why we were 40M in the hole... 18M spent on wages at one

point as well but you keep thinking everything is

hunky dory.

My point was that just before Lansdown took

over, we weren't on the verge of extinction so

how can you justify without him there would be

no club? We certainly wouldn't have the debt he

has accumulated for one.

But you as a fun accepted Lansdown's tenure. I can't recall any demonstrations.

Once again, football fans spouting off about misuse of expenditure when it's not their money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you should look at gate receipts versus wages / transfer fees. Without Lansdown we would be struggling big time. Nevertheless, you carry on with your smug ownership delusions of BCFC. By the way, how much money do you have to put into BCFC by monday? Cab we rely on you to facilitate transfers, loans, wage bills?

Other clubs have managed to do far better without creating anything like the debt we've seen since the gloves came off SL's self sufficiency policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you as a fun accepted Lansdown's tenure. I can't recall any demonstrations.

Once again, football fans spouting off about misuse of expenditure when it's not their money.

 

So you think 40M in the hole is perfectly acceptable?? For a lower midtable League 1 club?

 

And it is our club, we pay money into it... need examples? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you think 40M in the hole is perfectly acceptable?? For a lower midtable League 1 club?

And it is our club, we pay money into it... need

examples?

It's Stephen Lansdown's money. He's put far more into the club than you and if he wanted to rename the club SLFC tomorrow you wouldn't have any power to stop it. But thankfully, we have an owner who loves the club. Thank you is all it takes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...