Jump to content
IGNORED

Can someone clarify for me...


spudski

Recommended Posts

Just now, And Its Smith said:

Nobody will truly know.  Would be weird if he didn’t go for it though.  No harm in doing so. 

No harm I guess...but you've got to think to yourself, why would an assistant think they are good enough in their first job, to get promotion,  which was the remit. To improve upon what we already were.

I wouldn't be surprised if it was purely a stop gap appointment because of covid. Thrown to the lions in many ways.

Can imagine MA telling him to go for it, and dangling a carrot if he did well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, what I think happened was this:

- Board sacked LJ - right decision at the time, ran out of rope

- Expectation at the time of sacking was that 20/21 would be more “normal”. Holden asked to take charge on temporary basis, and view to appoint proper manager in summer

- Summer comes. Covid still here. Finances not normal. Holden asked to take charge permanently, but one year contract gives a get out

I think, had the club known that Covid would have restrictions now, they wouldn’t have sacked Johnson. Holden was intended as a stop gap to normality, and that normality has taken longer than envisaged. If they’d known Covid restrictions would be ongoing until end 2021 season, they’d have not rolled the dice.

Thats what the six weeks was. They only appointed Holden when they knew Covid would keep going. I don’t think he applied because he wouldn’t have been given the job under normal circumstances. I do question what happened with Jamie Mac, but that’s another topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Silvio Dante said:

To me, what I think happened was this:

- Board sacked LJ - right decision at the time, ran out of rope

- Expectation at the time of sacking was that 20/21 would be more “normal”. Holden asked to take charge on temporary basis, and view to appoint proper manager in summer

- Summer comes. Covid still here. Finances not normal. Holden asked to take charge permanently, but one year contract gives a get out

I think, had the club known that Covid would have restrictions now, they wouldn’t have sacked Johnson. Holden was intended as a stop gap to normality, and that normality has taken longer than envisaged. If they’d known Covid restrictions would be ongoing until end 2021 season, they’d have not rolled the dice.

Thats what the six weeks was. They only appointed Holden when they knew Covid would keep going. I don’t think he applied because he wouldn’t have been given the job under normal circumstances. I do question what happened with Jamie Mac, but that’s another topic.

Wasn’t Jamie Mac leaking stuff left, right and centre allegedly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, spudski said:

No harm I guess...but you've got to think to yourself, why would an assistant think they are good enough in their first job, to get promotion,  which was the remit. To improve upon what we already were.

I wouldn't be surprised if it was purely a stop gap appointment because of covid. Thrown to the lions in many ways.

Can imagine MA telling him to go for it, and dangling a carrot if he did well.

Maybe he realised he had a chance as he knows the players and there were 250,000 (pound) reasons to go for it rather than be unemployed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Silvio Dante said:

To me, what I think happened was this:

- Board sacked LJ - right decision at the time, ran out of rope

- Expectation at the time of sacking was that 20/21 would be more “normal”. Holden asked to take charge on temporary basis, and view to appoint proper manager in summer

- Summer comes. Covid still here. Finances not normal. Holden asked to take charge permanently, but one year contract gives a get out

I think, had the club known that Covid would have restrictions now, they wouldn’t have sacked Johnson. Holden was intended as a stop gap to normality, and that normality has taken longer than envisaged. If they’d known Covid restrictions would be ongoing until end 2021 season, they’d have not rolled the dice.

Thats what the six weeks was. They only appointed Holden when they knew Covid would keep going. I don’t think he applied because he wouldn’t have been given the job under normal circumstances. I do question what happened with Jamie Mac, but that’s another topic.

Why wouldn’t he apply for an estimated £250k job he was caretaker of?  Would be mad not to apply. It costs zero to apply 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, spudski said:

No harm I guess...but you've got to think to yourself, why would an assistant think they are good enough in their first job, to get promotion,  which was the remit. To improve upon what we already were.

I wouldn't be surprised if it was purely a stop gap appointment because of covid. Thrown to the lions in many ways.

Can imagine MA telling him to go for it, and dangling a carrot if he did well.

Yes, quite possibly, then why feed us all that bull? Even so, being a Championship manager isn't forgiving for a rookie, covid or not. The game is still the same…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, And Its Smith said:

Why wouldn’t he apply for an estimated £250k job he was caretaker of?  Would be mad not to apply. It costs zero to apply 

It costs zero, I agree. What I’m saying is that I think when Johnson was sacked there was no intent to give it to Holden (and if he wasn’t told, he should have read the room). It was only when things started moving on Covid wise he came into the frame. 
 

Bottom line - if he applied I can’t blame him. But I think that application wasn’t considered until the impact of Covid became clear. It’s the only way to explain the six weeks - the caretaker period wasn’t exactly compelling, just ok

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, joe jordans teeth said:

Spot on,I’m no heart surgeon but if I was offered good money I would have a crack at it 

I think people forget that managers are ultimately trying to earn a living like the rest of us.  I laugh when people say managers should resign.  Why would anyone resign and miss a big pay off?  If Holden is sacked, and the rolling 12 month contract is correct, then its a good pay off 

2 minutes ago, petehinton said:

Yes

What sort of stuff was he leaking?  Cannot think what the motivation would be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

I think people forget that managers are ultimately trying to earn a living like the rest of us.  I laugh when people say managers should resign.  Why would anyone resign and miss a big pay off?  If Holden is sacked, and the rolling 12 month contract is correct, then its a good pay off 

What sort of stuff was he leaking?  Cannot think what the motivation would be. 

Exactly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, spudski said:

...did DH apply for the job, or was he cajoled into the job and suggested he applied by MA, and he went for it?

Does it really matter?  He may have been encouraged to apply, as I would have expected, but we are where we are so no point going over this time and time again, especially when the process was (rightly) confidential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, petehinton said:

A fair amount over a decent length of time!

Oh come on Pete, stop the shite.

You normally come across as an intelligent and thoughtful poster but in recent weeks you have become immersed in conspiracy theories etc etc. If you have evidence then share it. Don't become a Boris Johnson clone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BigTone said:

Oh come on Pete, stop the shite.

You normally come across as an intelligent and thoughtful poster but in recent weeks you have become immersed in conspiracy theories etc etc. If you have evidence then share it. Don't become a Boris Johnson clone.

We’re both regular posters. Over time it becomes clear who posts BS and who you take seriously. Pete clearly falls into the latter category. It’s such a specific rumour and obviously no way of corroborating it - but I think Pete is reliable so I believe him here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BigTone said:

Oh come on Pete, stop the shite.

You normally come across as an intelligent and thoughtful poster but in recent weeks you have become immersed in conspiracy theories etc etc. If you have evidence then share it. Don't become a Boris Johnson clone.

Happily able to tell on DMs if you want to know desperately! Let’s just say there’s a reason there were so many ‘ITKs’ during Lee Johnson’s reign with Macca at the club

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, spudski said:

No harm I guess...but you've got to think to yourself, why would an assistant think they are good enough in their first job, to get promotion,  which was the remit. To improve upon what we already were.

I wouldn't be surprised if it was purely a stop gap appointment because of covid. Thrown to the lions in many ways.

Can imagine MA telling him to go for it, and dangling a carrot if he did well.

I said it at the time and I still believe it. He wasn’t intended to be appointed but he just interviewed well. His first interview and his sound of the city ? Radio show was brilliant and it was a “breath of fresh air” compared to LJs talk at the time.

he clearly knew our players, knew our problems and probably set out a clear plan to get it right. Covid, injuries and perhaps naivety on Deans part means it hasn’t played out that way.

First few games went alright

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Phileas Fogg said:

We’re both regular posters. Over time it becomes clear who posts BS and who you take seriously. Pete clearly falls into the latter category. It’s such a specific rumour and obviously no way of corroborating it - but I think Pete is reliable so I believe him here.

That's fine but show some evidence to collaborate the issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, joe jordans teeth said:

Spot on,I’m no heart surgeon but if I was offered good money I would have a crack at it 

Just don’t book me in for my coronary artery surgery with you!

And even then you have the intensive care unit to pick up the pieces afterwards. No such option for a football manager. Everybody can quickly see if you aren’t up to it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, petehinton said:

Happily able to tell on DMs if you want to know desperately! Let’s just say there’s a reason there were so many ‘ITKs’ during Lee Johnson’s reign with Macca at the club

There are so many ITK's that any credibility starts to wane. Some even state to be "substantially ITK". It really does have the opposite effect on any credibility. It seems that many want us to think they know the in and outs of all when the actual fact is that they don't. Problem is they are more than likely way off beam with regards to the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, petehinton said:

Happily able to tell on DMs if you want to know desperately! Let’s just say there’s a reason there were so many ‘ITKs’ during Lee Johnson’s reign with Macca at the club

Ok - I want to know desperately and please DM me. I've called out so many posters over the years and have yet to get a single reply. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, spudski said:

Yes I realise he applied for it...but was it after he'd been 'invited' so to speak. Or on a whim? 

Was there anything in...' if you apply there is a good chance of you getting it? '

Obviously that's pretty difficult to know for sure but it's my understanding he applied for it immediately. He was interviewed in the first round of interviews and the decision took 6 weeks to make, so I doubt he was given an indication he'd get the job before applying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, The Horse With No Name said:

I'll never forget the comment made by Ashton, or it might have been Junior, just prior to DH being appointed. He said that "Dean has got a lot of support from those within the club" we assumed that meant the players, and that is never a good sign when the manager is best mates with the players.

Would expect that to have been Tinman. In that he knew more academy types would get a go under Holden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kid in the Riot said:

Obviously that's pretty difficult to know for sure but it's my understanding he applied for it immediately. He was interviewed in the first round of interviews and the decision took 6 weeks to make, so I doubt he was given an indication he'd get the job before applying. 

But your previous post indicated that he 100% applied for it not that you understand he did. Now you are back tracking which indicates that you are not as ITK as you profess to be.  Do you know for sure? A simple yes or no will suffice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BigTone said:

But your previous post indicated that he 100% applied for it not that you understand he did. Now you are back tracking which indicates that you are not as ITK as you profess to be.  Do you know for sure? A simple yes or no will suffice.

Bloody hell Tone. 

I am certain he applied for it.

It is my UNDERSTANDING he applied for it IMMEDIATELY. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spudski said:

...did DH apply for the job, or was he cajoled into the job and suggested he applied by MA, and he went for it?

I was thinking this during the week. When we heard , he was thinking it over for the weekend . What were the conditions . On the face of it you’ve got a established championship club that needs a new manager . What is there to think about ?

MA says Dean always gets the final sign off on players etc . What if he doesn’t get to choose the pool of players to sign off on. Another one we’re the coaches. He said he knew “simmo” a bit but never knew Downing . This obviously means Ashton brought them in .

How can that possibly work 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kid in the Riot said:

Obviously that's pretty difficult to know for sure but it's my understanding he applied for it immediately. He was interviewed in the first round of interviews and the decision took 6 weeks to make, so I doubt he was given an indication he'd get the job before applying. 

Fair point.

My gut tells me he was a candidate that would have been strongly considered.

Purely for the fact, that imo, at the top, they are getting more insular and want everything done their way.

I get the impression MA is taking over...and JL just comes across as a wet weekend. 

SL has numerous interests...I can't help but think MA has taken advantage of a position he was given...he comes across as far more ruthless and a go getter. JL on the other hand just comes across as the lucky son who is only in a job because of his dad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kid in the Riot said:

Bloody hell Tone. 

I am certain he applied for it.

It is my UNDERSTANDING he applied for it IMMEDIATELY. 

So you really are unsure then based on previous posts. One says he did and one says you understand he did. This post just cements the fact that you really are unsure. Are you certain or do you understand ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, steviestevieneville said:

I was thinking this during the week. When we heard , he was thinking it over for the weekend . What were the conditions . On the face of it you’ve got a established championship club that needs a new manager . What is there to think about ?

MA says Dean always gets the final sign off on players etc . What if he doesn’t get to choose the pool of players to sign off on. Another one we’re the coaches. He said he knew “simmo” a bit but never knew Downing . This obviously means Ashton brought them in .

How can that possibly work 

My thoughts too. A rush job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, steviestevieneville said:

Because they’d been turned down by Hughton & or cook .

what Ashton said on twentymans show stuck with me.

not a lot of managers will work with our set up geoff (paraphrasing slightly ) 

It's something I've been saying for years. The pool of managers that would work under our remit, with the expectation of top 6 is minimal. Because as experienced managers they'd know it was nigh on impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, steviestevieneville said:

I was thinking this during the week. When we heard , he was thinking it over for the weekend . What were the conditions . On the face of it you’ve got a established championship club that needs a new manager . What is there to think about ?

MA says Dean always gets the final sign off on players etc . What if he doesn’t get to choose the pool of players to sign off on. Another one we’re the coaches. He said he knew “simmo” a bit but never knew Downing . This obviously means Ashton brought them in .

How can that possibly work 

Simpson was his manager at Shrewsbury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BigTone said:

So you really are unsure then based on previous posts. One says he did and one says you understand he did. This post just cements the fact that you really are unsure. Are you certain or do you understand ?

My reading of Kid's reply is:

Did he apply? Yes.

Did he apply immediately (i.e. a question of timing)? I understand he did.

Both indicating he was not "invited" to apply at some later point in other words but did so of his own accord at the outset.

They don't seem to be contradictory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, spudski said:

It's something I've been saying for years. The pool of managers that would work under our remit, with the expectation of top 6 is minimal. Because as experienced managers they'd know it was nigh on impossible.

This is why I’ve said for years , we’ll never get to the prem with him at the helm . He’s way to egotistical . He’s not a football man but thinks he is & surrounds himself with people that that strokes that ego. As @Davefevssaid about Ashton , they’re wannabe football men 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sir Geoff said:

GMG had a very good source for the Korey Smith leaving story, before it was officially announced. Which caused GMG  a bit of bother.

Yes correct, it even got to the stage where KS was forced into making a statement when he clearly didn’t want to at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

Correct....seen Downing at St George’s was about it.

So as spudski intimated . Even though it took nearly two months . It was all rushed towards the end . We obviously don’t know for sure , but it does point that way. 
MA

interview Hughton 

interview cook , there were more evidently.
none  of them want the job steve  

why not mark 

well it’s down to you and me meddling too much thinking we know about football .

well I’m good on fifa , bollocks get deano to do it . 
what fifa you got steve ?

2014 mark I’ll get some players names over to you 

sorted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, chinapig said:

My reading of Kid's reply is:

Did he apply? Yes.

Did he apply immediately (i.e. a question of timing)? I understand he did.

Both indicating he was not "invited" to apply at some later point in other words but did so of his own accord at the outset.

They don't seem to be contradictory.

"He did apply" and then "I understand he applied" are contradictory in my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Silvio Dante said:

To me, what I think happened was this:

- Board sacked LJ - right decision at the time, ran out of rope

- Expectation at the time of sacking was that 20/21 would be more “normal”. Holden asked to take charge on temporary basis, and view to appoint proper manager in summer

- Summer comes. Covid still here. Finances not normal. Holden asked to take charge permanently, but one year contract gives a get out

I think, had the club known that Covid would have restrictions now, they wouldn’t have sacked Johnson. Holden was intended as a stop gap to normality, and that normality has taken longer than envisaged. If they’d known Covid restrictions would be ongoing until end 2021 season, they’d have not rolled the dice.

Thats what the six weeks was. They only appointed Holden when they knew Covid would keep going. I don’t think he applied because he wouldn’t have been given the job under normal circumstances. I do question what happened with Jamie Mac, but that’s another topic.

With respect, you are inventing an explanation , using covid, that is simply not true. Maybe trying to explain the unexplainable, but covid was not the reason Holden was appointed. I know that makes it harder to comprehend why they did it, but Covid has no bearing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BigTone said:

There are so many ITK's that any credibility starts to wane. Some even state to be "substantially ITK". It really does have the opposite effect on any credibility. It seems that many want us to think they know the in and outs of all when the actual fact is that they don't. Problem is they are more than likely way off beam with regards to the truth.

The only ITK worth having , are those related to the owner. There is no one on OTIB that has that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BigTone said:

"He did apply" and then "I understand he applied" are contradictory in my mind.

The distinction is between whether he applied and when he applied (immediately or later).

Kid can speak for himself of course but he seems to be debunking a suggestion some have made that he was invited to apply because the club intended to give him the job anyway. The kind of conspiracy thinking you (and I) dislike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Psychopomp said:

With respect, you are inventing an explanation , using covid, that is simply not true. Maybe trying to explain the unexplainable, but covid was not the reason Holden was appointed. I know that makes it harder to comprehend why they did it, but Covid has no bearing. 

Ok buddy - if it’s “simply not true”, then  what is true? I’m trying to explain the unfathomable, so if you’re adamant I’m wrong, what is it you know?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Silvio Dante said:

Ok buddy - if it’s “simply not true”, the what is true? I’m trying to explain the unfathomable, so if you’re adamant I’m wrong, what is it you know?

 

I just told you. If you wish to invent Covid as the reason Holden was chosen, that is your choice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...