Jump to content
IGNORED

Norwood's Foul on Williams - Why no Red Card?


Curr Avon

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Dunno whether you're talking in general but.

Higher bar...you're merely unconvincing an attacking side, I say merely whereas a penalty is a good chance of an actual goal.

IMO anyway. Higher bar for a penalty...However our bar is somewhere up in the stratosphere!!

I was thinking of an incident towards the end of the match when we were attacking and one of their players went down because he felt contact  and the referee awarded a free kick straightaway. I think by then they knew whose side the ref was on!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Midred said:

I was thinking of an incident towards the end of the match when we were attacking and one of their players went down because he felt contact  and the referee awarded a free kick straightaway. I think by then they knew whose side the ref was on!

There was 2/3 occasions early first half, Wells was pushed, tripped and eventually the guy went straight through the back of him. He never got one of those decisions . 
Obviously there is no agenda against us, but those occasions seem to rack up, and the Penalty stats are laughable.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 02/11/2022 at 00:50, Davefevs said:

Two cars hitting each other at 30 mph each is 60mph impact and will look worse (and is worse) than if one car is stationary.

I mean, I know its irrelevant to the discussion and I'm late to the party but...

Two cars hitting each other head-on at 30mph is still only a 30mph impact as the force of both cars on each other are equally dissipated.  It has the same impact as a car hitting a immovable wall at 30mph.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OnCider said:

I mean, I know its irrelevant to the discussion and I'm late to the party but...

Two cars hitting each other head-on at 30mph is still only a 30mph impact as the force of both cars on each other are equally dissipated.  It has the same impact as a car hitting a immovable wall at 30mph.
 

 

I blame my Physics Teacher then!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 03/11/2022 at 12:28, Mr Popodopolous said:

It may already have been shared on here, Idk but can make a case for a pen IMO. Not a stonewaller of course.

Could it be more blatant?............I'm having a sweepstake as to which year we get a Pen?........I've got 2026, so i am in with a good chance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, maxjak said:

Could it be more blatant?............I'm having a sweepstake as to which year we get a Pen?........I've got 2026, so i am in with a good chance?

Its a penalty for 3 reasons:

1. It's a penalty;

2. It's a penalty;

3  It's a penalty.

Got that referees?

Whatdya mean, you couldn't give a ****!

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...