Jump to content

Marina's Rolls Royce

OTIB Supporter
  • Posts

    7167
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

Posts posted by Marina's Rolls Royce

  1. 12 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

    His reign wasn’t all about results and performances though was it?

    Recent history tells us that he inherited a shit situation, and kept us competitive in the championship…something others couldn’t do…whilst gradually improving us.

    And he had to sell his best players…apart from he wasn’t to invest at anywhere near the levels of others.

    I think most “Nige fans” are hugely respectful of the job he did rather than see him as anything like the messiah that his non-fans try to claim we see him as.

    He certainly had a lot of disciples. I was mainly Thomas.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
  2. 2 hours ago, chinapig said:

    Good way of not answering the question but do you think that's what the club means by top end? I'm assuming you won't actually be happy if we finish in 21st place.

     

    1 hour ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

    It is open to interpretation to an extent, don't disagree. Could be argued 7th-10th if the playoff tilt is meaningful and we aren't that far away points wise would qualify. Top third to 40%.

    Taking you at your word 2nd paragraph, that means NP, and even DH plus LJ mostly succeeded, think we were on the bottom 3 a couple of times under him...let alone before budget etc.

    I guess my humour is lost on here atm.

    I was alluding to the fact that as a long suffering City supporter- a good finish is one where we don't get relegated. I'm not used to much else since the 80's. 

    I refer your comments to the statement made by the Honourable member for @ChippenhamRed who did a great post about the trials and lack of tribulations of being a BCFC supporter.

    Managers come and go, players come and go but the excitement off the pitch seems more consistent than on it. Yet we go again.

     

    • Thanks 1
  3. 3 hours ago, JP Hampton said:

    So out of interest then, how would you interpret “top end”?

    The other end to bottom- strictly speaking. Does  top end means top 2? Or top 6? Is 7th top end? I think "top end" is indeed down to interpretation and deliberately vague when referenced by some.

     

    However, as a long term BCFC supporter my personal interpretation of top end is anywhere whatsoever higher than 22nd.

    • Confused 1
  4. 3 hours ago, ExiledAjax said:

    To be fair to @Marina's Rolls Royce I don't think they were accusing me of incandescent rage or fury. I had to read the post a couple of times but I think that reference was to other unnamed posters.

    If I'm wrong then I will be incandescent with rage, but it will be directed at Marina's Rolls Royce.

    I wasn't trying to stir any shit at all. The opposite really. Just had some time to refresh my memory of things said two weeks ago and try to fix in people's minds what was actually said!

    Well- I was actually saying it in support of your post not against it so you can maintain your blood pressure within recommended levels.

    I had a similar friendly exchange regarding an inaccurate Math Withers quote last night.

    My point is that someone only has to change a word in a quote to entirely change what was actually meant. My other point was that if everything that has gone on at BCFC is quite as bad as many think then the facts as they stand will prove the argument/statement/belief and doesn't need to veer off into fantasy, conspiracy or myth.

    3 hours ago, Davefevs said:

     

    But, there is a feeling from more fans that Manning shouldn’t be judged on this, because it was a deluded objective / aim.

    Isn’t there?

    Yes and no in that's it's not universal. A brief glance at the various threads since LM was appointed shows quite a divergence on what is expected of him and why but many of these comments may just be a knee jerk reaction whilst the dismissal of Nige is still very raw.

    • Like 2
  5. 26 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said:

     

    So he rambles a little bit, and answers it across several questions, but that final line is there for all to see. It's not quite as definite as BT's words but the hierarchy clearly think this squad is "very capable" of challenging "towards the top end".

    Just seen this thread.

    Yet again we see someone who is incandescent with rage re NP just making up a quote  to underpin their agenda and the "Simpsons crowd /mob" falling over themselves with support and agreement then someone comes along and proves that no such thing was said and are basically ignored.

    Facts are clearly unwanted if they challenge the accepted narrative.

    If people are so utterly convinced that the NP sacking was wrong/ totally damaging and all the other stuff that's been said then surely they shouldn't have to make stuff up to prove their point?

    3 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said:

    I didn't watch the Joe Sims one back as I haven't got time, but I don't recall JL going further in that one.

    Nope- he didn't say it on that interview either.

    • Like 4
    • Haha 1
    • Confused 1
  6. 3 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

    Thank you. I still see a bit of a contradiction or mixed messaging though.

    One of the poorest games in many a season. Albeit MW also said it was like what went before. Anyway it's one game, time to see how it goes over the coming period.

    Agreed. I expect that people choose which message they wanted to take away from his article. Mine was:

    "Everyone just needs to remain calm and keep a sense of perspective but maybe that isn’t the way of the modern football fan. We all need to trust the process and give the new head coach and his team our support and see where it takes us."

  7. 3 hours ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

    https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/sport/football/bristol-citys-performance-qpr-no-8902975

    Very patient. On one hand Math Withers says it was the worst game in many a year then says the performance is no great surprise as early days.

    Which was it..first he says it was no different to under Pearson, then in the next paragraph he says it was one of the worst in many a year.

    I think there is always a difficulty on OTIB to accurately quote what someone actually says and it's best not to change it. We've seen so many alleged quotes change in the last couple of weeks and it's appropriate to leave a quote unembellished:

    Math Withers "Let me say from the get-go, Saturday’s game was without doubt one of the poorest games of football that I have witnessed in many a season."

     

    • Thanks 2
  8. 14 hours ago, GrahamC said:

    Spot on.

    In addition to your comment about Rob seeing every game whereas I only see home games in person these days, I’d also add it’s an opinion.

    Not one I share but one he’s absolutely entitled to, especially considering his commitment to watching the club.

    Also, without resorting to semantics, he’s said the most “clueless” we have looked, not “the worst performance” which could certainly be interpreted as meaning they don’t understand what they’re being asked to do, which after so little time with Manning is perhaps understandable.

    Quote from @Olé   in response to me saying to another poster on Saturday that it wasn't the worst we've played. It was a very "popular post" in that almost 40 people agreed with him:

    "Taking account of the opposition, today was the worst football we’ve played in 18 months and respectfully, I have been at every single one of the matches, freezing cold Tuesday nights in Huddersfield and all.

    Birmingham and Reading away last season run it close but both were better teams than QPR who even objectively are one of the worst Championship teams I’ve ever seen and had absolutely nothing about them.

    The game was there for us on a plate, QPR looked like a team waiting to lose again and yet we ‘suddenly’ managed to look confused and scared and that is solely as a result of the change the club decided to make.

    Of course it is “far too early” to judge Manning, but if the owners choose to press the reset button mid season then it is never too early to judge that decision and on the basis of yesterday it is an act of self-sabotage."

     

    Of course when @Olé pens one of his matchday summaries- some who have been to the same match see things differently. And definitely question his player ratings. Because football is all about opinions and how many times do we hear " you were watching  a different match".

    I thought the performance against L1 Lincoln when we had the likes of Semenyo , Scott & Conway on the pitch but lost 3-1 at home was a worse performance than drawing 0-0 at QPR . If he is right that it was the "worst performance in 18 months" yet still resulted in a draw and with a clean sheet then one could argue that it bodes well if LM can get in a good performance. But that's probably Heresy for some who can't let Nige go.

     

     

    • Like 1
  9. 26 minutes ago, bearded_red said:

    But out of possession we’re really good? So it’s in possession that all the work needs to be done?

     

     "I’ve also got to be honest, as far as I’m concerned, this is a mediocre boring team that is destined for a mediocre boring mid table season, doesn’t make any sense to me to be spending cash trying to chase sixth place."

     

     

    So , BR, at least you're consistent in your thoughts on the BCFC team. We have indeed been a  mediocre boring team since your above post in Feb 2021 albeit that we've struggled to make a mid table finish under Nige- 19th, 17th and 14th. Hopefully we can now achieve a mid table finish or perhaps more?

    If you genuinely think that today was the worst performance ( at 0-0) then I'm not quite sure what team you've been watching. Your struggle with Lancaster Gate seems lightweight compared to your struggles with Ashton Gate.

    Now.... about the Reformation....It's such a shame about Tintern Abbey.

     

    • Like 1
  10. Just now, Phileas Fogg said:

    You are the ‘Matt Smith is awful’ guy - so if anyone is going to be the authority on criticising posters for making a potentially OTT hasty judgement then it’s fitting it should be you. 

    Take a look in the classics thread.

    I came to that conclusion after 4 matches of him being awful ( NOT ONE). I was subsequently proved wrong and have always been happy to admit and self deprecating.

    Funny you don't mention stuff like Bobby Reid  who I got spot on when he was dust binned by most on here. Or Wes Burns.

    Or maybe - Mark Ashton who may be personally painful to you.

  11. 1 minute ago, Harry said:

    I agree that the reasons for the departure have been suspect. However, I think you’re being to kind to Jon & Brian. 
    I genuinely believe that they genuinely think this squad is good enough. And that’s a huge concern for me. 

    Yep - you may be right and that would be worrying indeed. I maintain that they used that statement as an excuse and they think no such thing. Time will tell as will any transfer budget.

  12. 5 minutes ago, bearded_red said:

    You reckon we played well?

     

    41 minutes ago, bearded_red said:

    worst football we’ve played in 18 months.  

    You are such a silly pants!

    Nowhere have I said we played well , average or bad.

    If you think today was the worst football we've played in 18 months then I suspect you haven't gone to any matches.

    You should try it.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...