Jump to content

Marina's Rolls Royce

OTIB Supporter
  • Posts

    7167
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

Posts posted by Marina's Rolls Royce

  1. 7 hours ago, Jerseybean said:

     

     

     

    Southampton was the original departure point for the Mayflower

    The Pilgrims left Southampton on 5 August, 1620 to embark on their historic transatlantic voyage.

    They were on two ships - the iconic Mayflower and the lesser-known Speedwell - and boarded on the south coast of England set for a new life in America.

    The Speedwell had leaked on her voyage from Holland but was able to be repaired at Southampton’s extensive ship building facilities near the port’s West Quay.
     

     

    Due to the unseaworthiness, the Speedwell twice had to return to port having travelled from Holland to accompany the Mayflower. As a result, The Mayflower had to go it alone and took a number of the Speedwell's passengers and cargo.

    It actually departed from Plymouth in Devon on 16th September 1620 some 4 weeks after it left Southampton.

    FACT!

    sorry Southampton- you can't claim this epic moment in history and I hope that also goes for tomorrow.

    • Like 2
  2. 2 hours ago, sh1t_ref_again said:

     

    So after not bothering, instead prefer to attack and belittle the fans who did bother to attend and label them as sycophants or as others have called them Bristol Sport employees, BS bots, coach 1, happy clappers and a whole range of other insults and claim they are not representative of the fan base, as the views expressed last night do not match the mouthy few who dominate the post count on this forum. Perhaps its this forum that is not representative, whilst it may have 20k members, not that many regularly post and people I ask if they come on here, say can't be bothered as its so negative.

     

    OTIB is entirely representative of OTIB. I think you may have the number of otib members wrong at 20,000 I think it's much less. And let's face it- unless they are  an otib supporter then they could be a gas head, visiting rival, voyeur, spy or troll etc. There are no barriers to entry.

    Outrageous indignation on here is invariably not replicated in the wider ST fan base as calls for protests usually prove.

    On a match day there maybe circa 300-400 people on this site which given the amount of ST holders and BCFC members ( which is c.20,000) is pretty tiny and not entirely representative.

    • Like 2
  3. 8 hours ago, Davefevs said:

    I think you are right.  

    Petty and absurd.  “Unfair to Nige”, as big a fan as I was, I care more about Bristol City, and they made their chances of achieving success harder. It doesn’t help LM over the next 10-12 games either having a thin squad either.  Does it?  “Unfair to LM” too.

    Thoughts?

    Ok- here goes, Dave.

    I don't think that NP's sacking or the withholding of the full transfer funds was either petty or absurd. I think it was considered.

    No new Manager on the planet is going to be 100% happy with all the inherited squad- particularly if said new man has a different formation and style. Since Jan, NP was given the ability to (help) sign several players including TGH, Cornick,Mehmeti , McCrory, Roberts and Knight ( any others?) and it involved hard cash. TGH was 'bought' not as an experiment but with a get out clause. Good business.

    I remember NP having a pop at JL- everyone loved it but I thought he had just signed his own P45.

    Leaving nest egg funds for a new man for next season was sensible and considered.

    Dismissing Nige was also sensible and considered imo. I went through the following reactions : Shock, confusion, mild annoyance, acceptance and then delight.

    Your own reaction has been one of general outrage and I understand that as you have been an utter NP stalwart throughout his tenure- you thought he was the answer to a long standing problem and I didn't.

    So we look at our club through very different lenses: I totally believe that NP should have gone and that the Lansdown family are great for BCFC .... and you don't. Most people on OTIB agree with you but perhaps the wider fan base don't. I still don't understand how NP has become a cult on here and generally meh at BS3.

     

    • Like 3
    • Facepalm 1
  4. 8 hours ago, Ian M said:

    Top 6 was never the expectation for this squad.

    Comfortable mid-table, pushing top half is.

    I think it’s clear the Lansdowns had a personality clash with Nigel.

    If you have a difficult employee and he isn’t exceeding expectations, why keep them?

    So, for Nige, the target was promotion.

    For Liam, it isn’t. (That’s not to say he won’t try or achieve it)

    It was only in the immediate aftermath of Nige being removed that they spoke of challenging “at the top end” of the table, every interview situation since, starting from the Friday after, they have talked about progression instead, no hard targets.

    I believe that they had decided that NP had served his purpose and done the job he was paid to do and were never going to renew his contract but I agree that there was clearly a clash. I think the health issue brought forward their decision by half a season.

    I thought the timing was off but in hindsight believe they made the right decision at the right time. 

    I find Liam Manning a breath of fresh air and any nest egg support they give him is fantastic news. The views of some that this is in some way unfair on NP is, quite frankly, absurd.

     

    • Like 1
  5. 6 hours ago, tsgujdybh said:

    Are you serious??  We were awful in the 1st half.  Manning was incredibly lucky that TGH scored an absolute screamer out of nowhere and then , to top it off, we won (and scored) a rare penalty!  Had we not somehow found ourselves in front, despite having created absolutely nothing, when the half time whistle was blown, they'd have been booed off without a doubt.  The atmosphere could easily have turned nasty - LM was a lucky boy today without question!

    Thanks Nigel

  6. 27 minutes ago, Bristol Rob said:

    The most negative first half since Pulis. 

    Delighted to be 2 in front at the break, and all the more delighted with the 3 points, but if this is 'playing football on the front foot' then I have clearly misunderstood the term.

    Nige was sacked. I just think you need to get over it and support the new Coach. Perhaps even give him 1 transfer window (as opposed to six) and more than 1 home game (which we won) AND had  8 shots on target which is unusual in most matches over the past 2 1/2 years.

  7. 44 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

    Alex Scott was “guaranteed” PL bound, I think for Ayman we saw him as a longer term City player….if that makes sense?

    It makes complete sense. Sort of like an Andy  Llewellyn/Louis Carey type player who would likely stay with us doing a good job yet not be so good that they go elsewhere ( and before the pedants say about Coventry- it was fleeting).

     

  8. Always an honour to get an International call up even if it's only for Scotland U21. 

    The fact that he chose to stay at the HPC and train fully with the new set up has less to do with LM and everything to do with TC or his advisers making a strategic decision. IMO, it wasn't about Liam or club before country- it was a very sensible choice if he wants to get back into form within the Championship. He'll want to get back on fire for his future career whether that's with us or elsewhere.

    Meanwhile- Sam Bell for England? He'd have been mad to turn down that opportunity and now has two caps and an assist. 

    Everyone's a winner in these scenarios.

    • Like 7
  9. 5 minutes ago, Ronnie Sinclair said:

    If my boss was hovering all the time they'd get short shrift, people have to be left alone to do their job 

    There's always the possibility that LM asked for the input ? The possibility that it's moral support? The possibility that it was planned  by all parties? The possibility that BT isn't always "lurking in the background like an Ofsted Inspector?

    But, hey, let's not let an alternative possibility get in the way of a good ol' bit of Tinman bashing- the scoundrel.

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...