I can't let you get away with this hyperbole.
In HG's original post on the subject, he stated the person who was allegedly assaulted as "a person with learning difficulties who is not all there if you know what I mean?" (not a description with which I'm comfortable). In your version he has now become a "defenceless disabled person".
There are loads of people with various forms of learning difficulty who would never qualify as (nor would wish to be considered to be) disabled. In discussing this sensitive subject which clearly has aroused the emotions of a number of people, a wise man would desist from wantonly lying about the situation. You on the other hand have chosen to state an untruth which sadly reveals your true intent in posting on this thread.
Danny Baker was correct; you are all 'kin liars.