bcfc01

Its like their forum club reflects their supporters in general - they can dish it out but they can't take it. Pathetic.

Some bloke signs up to their little forum club and his first post criticises a new player and Barton and this is the response; "We’ve had a glut of trollish accounts register on here recently. I don’t know if it’s the relegation or the lockdowns or Joey Barton, but it’s got quite hard for the mods to deal with. It just ruins the place for other members quite frankly. So I’m sorry Smashngrab1, you might be a genuine Gashead, in which case feel free to reregister and share your passion about the Gas, but an obviously incendiary first post attacking a player who’s only been here five minutes suggests otherwise. So you’re gone." Classic moderating from them

I read somewhere that the average age of their supporter was one of the highest in the EFL and they have relatively few kids with season tickets.

That stand reminds me of somewhere....

They actually said that tickets were limited to season ticket holders and sold out which meant that other season ticket holders missed out They had 3k season ticket holders FFS. As you say, they are pathological liars. Hello Pikeys We know you are there

Two bit, chicken shit, tin pot, little outfit.

It was because we took the largest following ever to the Etihad. One or two Pikeys decided to inform the Man.City forum that they would have taken more and pointed out they took almost as many for an evening cup game to Chelsea or wherever (they didn't). Man.City forum laughed at them.

"Club House" Bless.

Listening to the radio today, apparently a lot of their income comes from renting out the pitch to the public and other teams. A new grass pitch up to standard will cost them hundreds of thousands and they'll lose the income from the artificial pitch. Is it worth it ?

Level on aggregate after 8 minutes. Would be funny to see them a league above the Pikeys..

Must have been a cup game; http://european-football-statistics.co.uk/attnclub/league/brir.htm

Fair play, there must be hundreds there. Pathetic

Problem they have is that what you have just said, they actually believe it. What was it ? Rovers have made more ground improvements than any other club (excluding Spurs). Unbelievable.

They've had chances to improve their current dump and upgrade to 12k but it was felt that it wasn't ambitious enough. Well, you have to cut yer cloth and build as you go when in their position. Even if they just built some temporary stands as Blackpool did, if would be a massive improvement on that dump they have now. But I guess that wouldn't be good enough or big enough etc etc. Stay still long enough and eventually everyone overtakes.

I remember that Just the Spurs state of the art stadium had more development than the pitch sprinklers, family tent stand, new canopy over the door to some grubby little bar, and the big screen supplied by Steve Lansdowns company.

Duelling banjos ? That would be good, but its because of the shape of the green bit covered in dog shit in front of the Lamb and the roads off it.

Level 5 is the National League, Level 6 is National Leagues North and South and so on down the pyramid. The Pikey morons called it division 5 as if it were part of the EFL. It is 92 years in total they've had in the EFL and one at non-league level 5.

True. You could also base it on how many seasons at level 2 for instance. Pikeys 19 Port Vale 41 Stockport 26 Grimsby 52 Notts cty 37 (30 level 1) Bradford 29 (12) Millwall 43 (2) Rotherham 31 Plymouth 40 Oldham 36 etc etc etc

Our average league position over the last 108 years is 36. Pikeys at 53.

They have been a league club for 92 years. 0 seasons at Level 1 19 seasons at Level 2 63 seasons at Level 3 10 seasons at Level 4 (soon to be 11) 1 season at Level 5 28 years since they were last at Level 2. Thems the facts - actual facts, not gas facts.

Apparently, they would have stayed up if the teams around them didn't win their games. Great stuff

Just the mention of his name and the poster is on the verge of a ban. https://gaschat.co.uk/thread/18022/matty-taylor-podcast That forum isn't a forum - its a shitty little clique that won't tolerate anything other than towing the line.

Controversy and trouble seems to follow that bloke. Risky appointment in many ways - which is nice.

I can understand some wanting to keep him in the hope he further improves and scores a few, probably doubling whats on the table. But 4m or 5m right at the start of the window gives NP a chance to get some very good OOC players in, or even loan players early in the window ready for pre-season. In that sense, 5m now could give NP a very good start to his rebuild. If he hits it off at Palace, then decent add ons will give the club a windfall in the future. Shame, but I think its best all round if he goes to Palace.

So, the Pikeys finish rock bottom on 38 points - 5 points below Swindon and 10 points from safety.. Marvellous effort