italian dave Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 Look what this dildo has written in the Swindon advertiser, injustice what a ******* tit, the guy could and should have been sent off 3/4 times and received a yellow, injustice my arse.swindonjason says... Is there injustice here? If the ref or any other of his 3 officials had seen it, Branco would have been sent off and served an immediate 3 Match ban. On his return, the 9 yellows collected would have been wiped clean. So, because none of the officials seen it and the fact he was later booked in the same game means he serves a 5 match ban. Something don't seem right. Also what do the officials get for missing it in the first place. We pay because of sky sports Yes, Jason, you do! Ha ha!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolf Hucker Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 Look what this dildo has written in the Swindon advertiser, injustice what a ******* tit, the guy could and should have been sent off 3/4 times and received a yellow, injustice my arse. swindonjason says... Is there injustice here? If the ref or any other of his 3 officials had seen it, Branco would have been sent off and served an immediate 3 Match ban. On his return, the 9 yellows collected would have been wiped clean. So, because none of the officials seen it and the fact he was later booked in the same game means he serves a 5 match ban. Something don't seem right. Also what do the officials get for missing it in the first place. We pay because of sky sports Applying his own brand of logic and justice, had Branco scored a goal any time after the 6th minute no doubt Jason would have been very happy for that to have been wiped out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHILINFRANCE Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 Look what this dildo has written in the Swindon advertiser, injustice what a ******* tit, the guy could and should have been sent off 3/4 times and received a yellow, injustice my arse. swindonjason says... Is there injustice here? If the ref or any other of his 3 officials had seen it, Branco would have been sent off and served an immediate 3 Match ban. On his return, the 9 yellows collected would have been wiped clean. So, because none of the officials seen it and the fact he was later booked in the same game means he serves a 5 match ban. Something don't seem right. Also what do the officials get for missing it in the first place. We pay because of sky sports This is the 'delicious irony' to which I referred yesterday. Nevertheless, and whilst 'sympathy' is not the right word, I do understand the 'injustice' (definitely NOT the right word) in this argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slippin cider Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 Glad he's been suspended for 5 games, filthy cheating scum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 Don't forget he was lucky not to miss a large chunk of the game on Tuesday, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 still helps screw up ther play off bid, if it wasnt for the sky cameras he would have got away with it . same as all season really Which is precisely what some on here said BEFORE THE GAME. He must be a right dipstick not to realise that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 Added to the two he's already serving. That'll mean he'll only be available for Swindles last two games. Should have got charged by the police for ABH as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 Added to the two he's already serving. That'll mean he'll only be available for Swindles last two games. Should have got charged by the police for ABH as well. Back for the playoffs which is all they care about now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I am the mole Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 And Aden Flint is most assuredly not a wuss!i'm probably the only one but My opinion is he made a meal of it went down a bit easy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolf Hucker Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 Exactly. There is no injustice or anything close to it. The bloke assaulted Flint and got retrospectively caught. If he had been sent off, we would have been playing against 10, so no advantage on the night for us - that is injustice. He deserves 5 games just for the forearm smash on Flint. It does throw up some interesting possibilities though. Had Branco actually been booked for his second assault on Flinty then received a straight red for the third, assuming that the FA then retrospectively reviewed the first offence and decided, as they now have, that a sending off was warranted, would we have seen Branco effectively punished for being booked once and sent off twice during the same match? I make that would have resulted in an 8 game ban, given his previous disciplinary record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 i'm probably the only one but My opinion is he made a meal of it went down a bit easy! You are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E.J.Thribb Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 Dirty bastard got what he deserved. 5 games should derail Swindle (I hope ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 i'm probably the only one but My opinion is he made a meal of it went down a bit easy! The bloke forearmed him in the face. The 'goin' down' is irrelevant. Your opinion is not properly formed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHILINFRANCE Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 The bloke forearmed him in the face. The 'goin' down' is irrelevant. Your opinion is not properly formed. But not exactly a non sequitur! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shelton’s Love Gravy Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 Accepted charge, 3 game ban.http://www.thefa.com/news/governance/2015/apr/raphael-rossi-branco-suspended That's a reasonable start. But they should also chop his cock off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoldenBall Posted April 10, 2015 Report Share Posted April 10, 2015 That's a reasonable start. But they should also chop his cock off. And make him sit in the stands with the mutants at the County Ground, the worst punishment possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I am the mole Posted April 11, 2015 Report Share Posted April 11, 2015 The bloke forearmed him in the face. The 'goin' down' is irrelevant. Your opinion is not properly formed.i didn't say that the forearm was right just he didn't need to go down like that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exAtyeoMax Posted April 11, 2015 Report Share Posted April 11, 2015 Look what this dildo has written in the Swindon advertiser, injustice what a ******* tit, the guy could and should have been sent off 3/4 times and received a yellow, injustice my arse. swindonjason says... Is there injustice here? If the ref or any other of his 3 officials had seen it, Branco would have been sent off and served an immediate 3 Match ban. On his return, the 9 yellows collected would have been wiped clean. So, because none of the officials seen it and the fact he was later booked in the same game means he serves a 5 match ban. Something don't seem right. Also what do the officials get for missing it in the first place. We pay because of sky sports No, because he was in the wrong and got caught! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exAtyeoMax Posted April 11, 2015 Report Share Posted April 11, 2015 i didn't say that the forearm was right just he didn't need to go down like that! He didn't go down when Branco tried to wrestle him to the floor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted April 11, 2015 Report Share Posted April 11, 2015 That's a reasonable start. But they should also chop his cock off. Slowly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.