MarcusX Posted February 6 Report Share Posted February 6 23 hours ago, Sir Geoff said: Even more of a farce for a replay where it wasn't used in the first game. Yep was just going to post this In light of @Shauntaylor85 post about signings not being able to play (because it’s a replay) then there shouldn’t be different rules either Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcusX Posted February 6 Report Share Posted February 6 22 hours ago, BS3 Ark at Ee said: Heard it was more like 1,900 but if it’s 2,500 then that’s even better 22 hours ago, Komazawa said: Yep it's just over 2500 so far Think there’s debate whether the 200ish left on sale is from the overall allocation of 2800 or from a reduced allocation Has jt been confirmed anywhere? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bard Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 On 05/02/2024 at 23:51, E.G.Red said: Yes they can use VAR in a replay even though it wasn't used/ available in the original match, but you can't select players for the replay that wern't available for the first game. Where the logic in that? I don't see the problem. No one complains when the ref changes do they? That's a far greater change than using VAR or not. Rules about players needing to be registered before a tie starts are fair. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.