In the Net

Sorry - should have been 4k+ season ticket sales. ? £4k is probably the transfer budget!

Think I saw £4k+ written somewhere, so, pretty much what you've guessed.

Now you know why they call us The Family Club!

I can't speak for every other Rovers supporter, I am sure that various different views are held by others. From social media, and the part of the ground I frequent, I would say that a lot of people have accepted that tarting up The Mem is the only certainty at the moment. Maybe those who continue to talk about a new ground are expecting investment from elsewhere?

No point in demanding investment if the money isn't there - which it isn't. The era of getting has-beens thankfully seems to have diminished under DC, have to feel sorry for the bloke, being expected to unearth a Taylor or Bodin for nowt in every transfer window. I've got to the stage where I put my energies into supporting the team on matchdays, rather than trying to change things which are beyond my reach. With age comes wisdom!

Brown wasn't sold, so nothing to disclose. The other deals are what they are, that's the problem when you don't have the funds to take a chance on tying players down with lucrative, long-term contracts. Such is life.

"Resolution of allotment of securities" - this document has been filed at Companies House, but is not yet available to view. Can any of the accountancy experts on here please explain what this may entail?

Not surprised, it did fly under the radar, not sure if it even made the local press. It will be interesting to see what happens to the other fans' Director, who is still in situ at the moment.

He resigned a few months ago. He was one of the fans' Directors, and I think that he felt his role was obsolete - even more so than under the previous regime.

I'd like to think so - fingers crossed here!

It has, I think it's a fairly standard part of accounting practice, so doesn't mean a great deal.

Don't forget the new electric hand dryers in the bogs, we're definitely on the way up.

Those were the days .....

As the police got the watch back, I guess that they did things properly as well as using social media. The "kid" is 14 years old, and may well have got rid of the watch before he was identified. You may want to ask the same question of the person who put his picture on this thread?

Doing our bit to save them from any more cutbacks! To give credit, I think it was the police who physically got the watch back from the lad.

When my car was stolen off my drive, all I got was a crime number. Even though the thieves must have come prepared as the battery was flat, and I said that I could give a description of two blokes who had knocked at the door asking to buy it a couple of weeks earlier. Do you really expect Avon & Somerset's finest to waste manpower on a stolen watch?

We do have fans who ask questions, but unfortunately this doesn't include the two people who had access to the Board Meetings. For many years the Supporters Club has been hand in glove with the owners, willingly handing over money without question. They recently sold the SC premises at Two Mile Hill without consulting their membership, and the shortfalls of their accounting processes are well known. I think the SC is an outdated institution which needs to re-think it's purpose.

Nobody will notice any difference, as the fans' Directors haven't questioned the Board for at least 10 years.

Yes, could easily have been 1 - 6

Yes, I referred to the picture, not the flag.

You would hope so, unfortunately some scrotes don't seem to have a filter with regards to unacceptable behaviour.

I was responding to a comment on the Gloucester flag, but it applies to the other pic as well.

Disgusting - hope it gets ripped to shreds if they display it again.

Clarke has made it clear that he hasn't got a top 6 budget. I presume Hamer meant that Clarke was given a budget which should enable him to get the team into the top 6, which is a totally different scenario.