Jump to content
IGNORED

England Vs India Test Series


Monkeh

Recommended Posts

So India run the game now do they?! How on earth are they allowed to dictate like that?

 

Money and power that they possess of course...

 

On a slightly smaller scope Bangladesh are a pretty awful test side and are pretty much an embarrassment but they also have money and a very fanatical fanbase who go loopy at every 2 or 3 runs... Hence why Ireland or the Netherlands get a look in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally think it's great there's no DRS, no faffifng around with reviews etc

There have been at least 2 decisions that would have been overturned, IMO it's better to get the right decision.

It's only because some of India's senior players were given out when it was first introduced they turned against it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been at least 2 decisions that would have been overturned, IMO it's better to get the right decision.

It's only because some of India's senior players were given out when it was first introduced they turned against it.

You still get wrong decisions with DRS eg. when a team has run out of reviews.

 

Best to leave everything to the umpires imo, things always even themselves out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same reason as two teams in football don't walk off after 60 minutes if they are both happy with a draw.

Totally differant a wicket over 5 days which only had 28 wickets on it at the time.Both teams knew by tea it was a draw, so why couldn't they call it quits.

England were using Ali and Root and saving there seamers, can see that the crowd want a fair days entertainment but it wasn't really entertainment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally differant a wicket over 5 days which only had 28 wickets on it at the time.Both teams knew by tea it was a draw, so why couldn't they call it quits.

England were using Ali and Root and saving there seamers, can see that the crowd want a fair days entertainment but it wasn't really entertainment.

Cook bowling wasn't entertaining?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes it was, but why was he bowling. Game was over and basically were time wasting. Just a shame its got to go to last hour.

Not sure you would be saying that if you paid for a ticket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally differant a wicket over 5 days which only had 28 wickets on it at the time.Both teams knew by tea it was a draw, so why couldn't they call it quits.

England were using Ali and Root and saving there seamers, can see that the crowd want a fair days entertainment but it wasn't really entertainment.

When Germany went 5-0 up the other day everyone knew they had won. Should everyone have gone home then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally differant 65 of 90 mins to go at the football.

There were 30 out of 450 overs to go at the cricket.

I personally think on a wicket which had only seen 28 wickets in 420 overs in four and a half days why couldn't they just agree to a draw instead of waiting for a hour and England using mainly second string bowlers for that time.

Just think a bit of common sense and value for the crowd should of been used. You pay to see the top players and because they can't win they don't get used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...