Bar BS3 Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 9 hours ago, Leveller said: Slanging match and routine mutual insults aside, this would have been a very odd tale to have made up. However, if Henbury Gas is honest, he may still have been misled - not lied to - by a person with learning difficulties who got unduly upset by an unexceptional incident, no? His mistake may well be to have stated foolishly that he knew it to be true, just because he was told it. I for one can imagine a situation where a person with learning difficulties just maybe sat in the wrong seat and got talked to by someone whose seat it was, in a slightly aggressive way. At the end of the day, it may be that something that slight has got wildly exaggerated. All speculation, I know, but so is the whole dialogue. As you rightly say, HG stated “that he knows it to be true” He also, iirc said that the victim was sat in their own STH seat, not someone else’s. If it infact transpires that they were sat in someone else’s seat, then they could easily have been told to move. I very much doubt that they suffered the loss of teeth over a simple misunderstanding..! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bar BS3 Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 45 minutes ago, Red Army 75 said: I actually think Mr ass . lied. Corrected for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Army 75 Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 35 minutes ago, Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan said: I seem to remember (again sadly in the Gaschat thread that was deleted) that the original claim of ‘teeth’ being knocked out changed to one ‘tooth’ and then eventually ‘tooth removed by dentist at a later date’. Which was stuck under the victims pillow. And when he woke up he had a rovers season ticket . 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
54-46 Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 49 minutes ago, Peter O Hanraha-hanrahan said: I seem to remember (again sadly in the Gaschat thread that was deleted) that the original claim of ‘teeth’ being knocked out changed to one ‘tooth’ and then eventually ‘tooth removed by dentist at a later date’. Either way, he’s got a gap then No wonder he was made so welcome by the Sags 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 Sounds like we have seen the last of gashead1981. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonR Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 1 hour ago, Super said: Sounds like we have seen the last of gashead1981. I do wonder if it was HG desperately trying to cover his behind. Even if it was He still got a friendlier welcome than we would on Sadchat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 28 minutes ago, SimonR said: I do wonder if it was HG desperately trying to cover his behind. Even if it was He still got a friendlier welcome than we would on Sadchat. no, theirs a mod over there called gashead1981, I suspect he releasing the very real trouble HG could be in about this made up story Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesBCFC Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 3 hours ago, myol'man said: No you're wrong, the story now doing the rounds amongst the few is that a defenceless disabled person had his teeth knocked back down his throat by a huge vicious 'ted, witnessed by thousands who did nothing, recorded then deleted on CCTV, and ignored by the police and the media cos they're all gurt 'teds too! Sounds plausible to me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin phantom Posted July 10, 2018 Admin Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 2 hours ago, Super said: Sounds like we have seen the last of gashead1981. Why do you think that @Super ? A shame to not have one of the more sensible posters on here still Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 3 minutes ago, phantom said: Why do you think that @Super ? A shame to not have one of the more sensible posters on here still gashead1981 Moderator Posts: 1,017 Member is Online Posting Level Next Level in 483 posts 3 hours ago via mobile Henbury Gas likes this Quote Post by gashead1981 on 3 hours ago Ignorance is best ignored most of the time though Old, and because I’m a thick skinned sort of person, ignoring the bellends is easy done. I’ve said my piece over there and they won’t listen to reason. You can’t educate pork.....only stuff it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebristolred Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 How on earth can he come away thinking that we're the ones being ridiculous? He's been proven wrong about their fantasy policy of apparently not banning 'teds' unless they kick off, and just ignored it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bar BS3 Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 18 minutes ago, nebristolred said: How on earth can he come away thinking that we're the ones being ridiculous? He's been proven wrong about their fantasy policy of apparently not banning 'teds' unless they kick off, and just ignored it. It’s what they do..! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelRobartes Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 20 minutes ago, nebristolred said: How on earth can he come away thinking that we're the ones being ridiculous? He's been proven wrong about their fantasy policy of apparently not banning 'teds' unless they kick off, and just ignored it. As others have probably said, Danny Baker was right: pathological liars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC11 Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 Reckon HG would have literally shit himself by now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC11 Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 Wonder why our little gas chum is still lurking on here? Despite running off back to Asschat slating us all, p!ss off back there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 (edited) another belter, poorblue Reserve Team Posts: 192 Member is Online Posting Level Next Level in 308 posts 12 minutes ago Quote Post by poorblue on 12 minutes ago Everyone is entitled to their opinion but I despair at some of the rubbish quoted on this forum regarding the Mem. Sorry for the detail but it might enlighten a few. In the Premier Division every club has 100% all seated stadiums. The vast majority have over 30000 capacity, the glaring odd one out being Bournemouth with 11360. The clubs that normally get relegated and then promoted back up a few seasons later almost every time are those with capacity of between 20000 and 30000. In the Championship every club except one, being Brentford, has all seated stadiums. It is mandatory for the top two tiers of the league to be all seater. All seater stadiums are not a panacea for watching football or success on the field. Ask Sunderland fans! The fans sometimes are subjected to getting wet because the roof doesn't cover the seating and post holding the roof obstructs the view and some fans are squashed into corners with little view of the pitch. Villa 42785 Birmingham 29409 Blackburn 31367 Bolton 28723 Brentford 12763 Bristol City 27000 Derby 335897 Hull 25586 Ipswich 30311 Leeds 37890 Middleboro 34742 Millwall 20146 Norwich 27244 Notts Forest 30445 Preston 23404 QPR 18439 Reading 24161 Rotherham 12061 Sheff Utd 32702 Sheff Weds 39732 Stoke 30089 Swansea 21088 West Brom 26850 Wigan 25138 From the above capacities you can clearly see which clubs that usually stay comfortably in the Championship and flit with promotion to the top tier and those that drop back down to level 3. It's interesting that our neighbours over the river even with a new stadium only have a capacity 11th from the bottom of the championship but not likely high enough to be sustainable in the top tier if they got there. In Division 1 there are 16 clubs that have 100% all seater stadiums and 8 do not ranging from 40% to 75% seating, the Mem being one with 50%. AFC Wimbledon 4850 Accrington 5057 Barnsley 23287 Blackpool 16750 Bradford 25136 Bristol Rovers 12300 Burton 6912 Charlton 27111 Coventry 32609 Doncaster R 15231 Fleetwood 5327 Gills 11582 Luton 10356 Oxford 12500 Peterboro 15314 Plymouth 16388 Portsmouth 21100 Rochdale 10000 Scunny 9088 Shrews 9875 Southend 12392 Sunderland 49000 Walsall 11300 Wycombe 10137 From the above capacities you can clearly see which clubs that usually stay comfortably in Division 1 and flit with promotion to the Championship and those that drop back down to level 4. Clearly this shows that the Gas are where traditionally we have usually played our football. Rovers sit 13th from the bottom capacity wise. In Division 2 13 clubs have all seater stadiums, the rest range from 35% to 50%. Bury 11840 Cambridge 8127 Carlisle 17949 Cheltenham 7066 Colchester 10105 Crawley 6134 Crewe 10153 Exeter 6087 Forest GR 4803 Grimsby 9052 Lincoln 10120 Macclesfield 9186 Mansfield 9186 MK Dons 30500 Northhampton 7798 Morecombe 6476 Newport 7850 Notts County 19841 Oldham 13512 Port Vale 19052 Stevenage 6722 Swindon 11547 Tranmere 16587 Yeovil 9562 From the above capacities you can clearly see which clubs that usually stay comfortably in Division 2 and flit with promotion to Division 1 and those that drop back down to level 5. Only 6 teams have a capacity greater than the gas. The point I'm trying to make is that Rovers are roughly in the middle of the football league where their capacity says it should sustainably be located. Having been to well over 120 stadiums watching Rovers over the years I can say first hand that the quality of the Men is roughly in the middle of all those grounds. The two worst that I recall were York and Atringham both of which made Twerton Park look regal. Those that state the Mem is one of the worst stadiums in the football league are IMO either frustrated, deluded or are glory hunters and have only attended those big capacity away big grounds Topper saying they'd avg 15k with a bigger ground and that they have out grown the mem, Rovers can't even sell out the mem Edited July 10, 2018 by Monkeh 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazooka Joe Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 7 hours ago, Red Army 75 said: Which was stuck under the victims pillow. And when he woke up he had a rovers season ticket . That would be adding insult to injury - and that's the tooth, the whole tooth and nothing but the tooth! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolf Hucker Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 38 minutes ago, Monkeh said: Derby 335897 Blimey 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOTBLUE Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Rudolf Hucker said: Blimey Double blimey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bianconeri Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 57 minutes ago, Monkeh said: another belter, poorblue Reserve Team Posts: 192 Member is Online Posting Level Next Level in 308 posts 12 minutes ago Quote Post by poorblue on 12 minutes ago Everyone is entitled to their opinion but I despair at some of the rubbish quoted on this forum regarding the Mem. Sorry for the detail but it might enlighten a few. In the Premier Division every club has 100% all seated stadiums. The vast majority have over 30000 capacity, the glaring odd one out being Bournemouth with 11360. The clubs that normally get relegated and then promoted back up a few seasons later almost every time are those with capacity of between 20000 and 30000. In the Championship every club except one, being Brentford, has all seated stadiums. It is mandatory for the top two tiers of the league to be all seater. All seater stadiums are not a panacea for watching football or success on the field. Ask Sunderland fans! The fans sometimes are subjected to getting wet because the roof doesn't cover the seating and post holding the roof obstructs the view and some fans are squashed into corners with little view of the pitch. Villa 42785 Birmingham 29409 Blackburn 31367 Bolton 28723 Brentford 12763 Bristol City 27000 Derby 335897 Hull 25586 Ipswich 30311 Leeds 37890 Middleboro 34742 Millwall 20146 Norwich 27244 Notts Forest 30445 Preston 23404 QPR 18439 Reading 24161 Rotherham 12061 Sheff Utd 32702 Sheff Weds 39732 Stoke 30089 Swansea 21088 West Brom 26850 Wigan 25138 From the above capacities you can clearly see which clubs that usually stay comfortably in the Championship and flit with promotion to the top tier and those that drop back down to level 3. It's interesting that our neighbours over the river even with a new stadium only have a capacity 11th from the bottom of the championship but not likely high enough to be sustainable in the top tier if they got there. In Division 1 there are 16 clubs that have 100% all seater stadiums and 8 do not ranging from 40% to 75% seating, the Mem being one with 50%. AFC Wimbledon 4850 Accrington 5057 Barnsley 23287 Blackpool 16750 Bradford 25136 Bristol Rovers 12300 Burton 6912 Charlton 27111 Coventry 32609 Doncaster R 15231 Fleetwood 5327 Gills 11582 Luton 10356 Oxford 12500 Peterboro 15314 Plymouth 16388 Portsmouth 21100 Rochdale 10000 Scunny 9088 Shrews 9875 Southend 12392 Sunderland 49000 Walsall 11300 Wycombe 10137 From the above capacities you can clearly see which clubs that usually stay comfortably in Division 1 and flit with promotion to the Championship and those that drop back down to level 4. Clearly this shows that the Gas are where traditionally we have usually played our football. Rovers sit 13th from the bottom capacity wise. In Division 2 13 clubs have all seater stadiums, the rest range from 35% to 50%. Bury 11840 Cambridge 8127 Carlisle 17949 Cheltenham 7066 Colchester 10105 Crawley 6134 Crewe 10153 Exeter 6087 Forest GR 4803 Grimsby 9052 Lincoln 10120 Macclesfield 9186 Mansfield 9186 MK Dons 30500 Northhampton 7798 Morecombe 6476 Newport 7850 Notts County 19841 Oldham 13512 Port Vale 19052 Stevenage 6722 Swindon 11547 Tranmere 16587 Yeovil 9562 From the above capacities you can clearly see which clubs that usually stay comfortably in Division 2 and flit with promotion to Division 1 and those that drop back down to level 5. Only 6 teams have a capacity greater than the gas. The point I'm trying to make is that Rovers are roughly in the middle of the football league where their capacity says it should sustainably be located. Having been to well over 120 stadiums watching Rovers over the years I can say first hand that the quality of the Men is roughly in the middle of all those grounds. The two worst that I recall were York and Atringham both of which made Twerton Park look regal. Those that state the Mem is one of the worst stadiums in the football league are IMO either frustrated, deluded or are glory hunters and have only attended those big capacity away big grounds Topper saying they'd avg 15k with a bigger ground and that they have out grown the mem, Rovers can't even sell out the mem Plural of stadium is stadia. Never heard of Alringham but Altrincham’s ground is ok, not a palace but better than the Memorial Ground. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC11 Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 1 hour ago, Monkeh said: another belter, poorblue Reserve Team Posts: 192 Member is Online Posting Level Next Level in 308 posts 12 minutes ago Quote Post by poorblue on 12 minutes ago Everyone is entitled to their opinion but I despair at some of the rubbish quoted on this forum regarding the Mem. Sorry for the detail but it might enlighten a few. In the Premier Division every club has 100% all seated stadiums. The vast majority have over 30000 capacity, the glaring odd one out being Bournemouth with 11360. The clubs that normally get relegated and then promoted back up a few seasons later almost every time are those with capacity of between 20000 and 30000. In the Championship every club except one, being Brentford, has all seated stadiums. It is mandatory for the top two tiers of the league to be all seater. All seater stadiums are not a panacea for watching football or success on the field. Ask Sunderland fans! The fans sometimes are subjected to getting wet because the roof doesn't cover the seating and post holding the roof obstructs the view and some fans are squashed into corners with little view of the pitch. Villa 42785 Birmingham 29409 Blackburn 31367 Bolton 28723 Brentford 12763 Bristol City 27000 Derby 335897 Hull 25586 Ipswich 30311 Leeds 37890 Middleboro 34742 Millwall 20146 Norwich 27244 Notts Forest 30445 Preston 23404 QPR 18439 Reading 24161 Rotherham 12061 Sheff Utd 32702 Sheff Weds 39732 Stoke 30089 Swansea 21088 West Brom 26850 Wigan 25138 From the above capacities you can clearly see which clubs that usually stay comfortably in the Championship and flit with promotion to the top tier and those that drop back down to level 3. It's interesting that our neighbours over the river even with a new stadium only have a capacity 11th from the bottom of the championship but not likely high enough to be sustainable in the top tier if they got there. In Division 1 there are 16 clubs that have 100% all seater stadiums and 8 do not ranging from 40% to 75% seating, the Mem being one with 50%. AFC Wimbledon 4850 Accrington 5057 Barnsley 23287 Blackpool 16750 Bradford 25136 Bristol Rovers 12300 Burton 6912 Charlton 27111 Coventry 32609 Doncaster R 15231 Fleetwood 5327 Gills 11582 Luton 10356 Oxford 12500 Peterboro 15314 Plymouth 16388 Portsmouth 21100 Rochdale 10000 Scunny 9088 Shrews 9875 Southend 12392 Sunderland 49000 Walsall 11300 Wycombe 10137 From the above capacities you can clearly see which clubs that usually stay comfortably in Division 1 and flit with promotion to the Championship and those that drop back down to level 4. Clearly this shows that the Gas are where traditionally we have usually played our football. Rovers sit 13th from the bottom capacity wise. In Division 2 13 clubs have all seater stadiums, the rest range from 35% to 50%. Bury 11840 Cambridge 8127 Carlisle 17949 Cheltenham 7066 Colchester 10105 Crawley 6134 Crewe 10153 Exeter 6087 Forest GR 4803 Grimsby 9052 Lincoln 10120 Macclesfield 9186 Mansfield 9186 MK Dons 30500 Northhampton 7798 Morecombe 6476 Newport 7850 Notts County 19841 Oldham 13512 Port Vale 19052 Stevenage 6722 Swindon 11547 Tranmere 16587 Yeovil 9562 From the above capacities you can clearly see which clubs that usually stay comfortably in Division 2 and flit with promotion to Division 1 and those that drop back down to level 5. Only 6 teams have a capacity greater than the gas. The point I'm trying to make is that Rovers are roughly in the middle of the football league where their capacity says it should sustainably be located. Having been to well over 120 stadiums watching Rovers over the years I can say first hand that the quality of the Men is roughly in the middle of all those grounds. The two worst that I recall were York and Atringham both of which made Twerton Park look regal. Those that state the Mem is one of the worst stadiums in the football league are IMO either frustrated, deluded or are glory hunters and have only attended those big capacity away big grounds Topper saying they'd avg 15k with a bigger ground and that they have out grown the mem, Rovers can't even sell out the mem All that waffle and he still won’t admit the Mem is a shithole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesBCFC Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 Here is a picture of Altrincham's ground. I can only see one temporary building, so that automatically makes it a better ground than The Mem. Note to users of GasChat: A bunch of tents loosely together around a field of (what sometimes resembles) grass isn't a good stadium. If it was then I have been camping at some cracking stadia. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 (edited) Hugo the Elder Moderator Posts: 7,871 Member is Online Posting Level about an hour ago via mobile Russgas, Henbury Gas, and 1 more like this Post by Hugo the Elder on about an hour ago This has run its course. Thread locked. Any complaints feel free to pm any of the Mod team. Any personal abuse directed at those actually involved in this situation will be deleted. Any new threads related to this will also just be taken down. As I've said over and over, it's just not worth the grief. what we can take from that is HG has been proven a liar and has had a warning about posting it again, Edited July 10, 2018 by Monkeh 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Popodopolous Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 Well it never happened then, as we all knew. What truly baffles me is having concocted, or embellished the story, Henbury Gas dug and dug and dug himself into a hole. Is it possible there was a row? Yes. Definitely not a chance, not one iota of truth to this though, yet he pushed it and pushed it all the way to meeting a police officer! Nuts! Would have liked to have been a fly on the wall for his explanations... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Army 75 Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 18 minutes ago, Monkeh said: Hugo the Elder Moderator Posts: 7,871 Member is Online Posting Level about an hour ago via mobile Russgas, Henbury Gas, and 1 more like this Post by Hugo the Elder on about an hour ago This has run its course. Thread locked. Any complaints feel free to pm any of the Mod team. Any personal abuse directed at those actually involved in this situation will be deleted. Any new threads related to this will also just be taken down. As I've said over and over, it's just not worth the grief. what we can take from that is HG has been proven a liar and has had a warning about posting it again, Quick shut it down. Put your fingers in your ears and stamp your feet. Pathetic gashead ***** 2 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steviestevieneville Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 (edited) @Gashead1981 so the thread where your mate henbury gas lied about our club has been locked and nobodies allowed to mention it again . Do we get a apology ? Do you lot call him out as billy bullshit which is what we all know he is ? As you were once called by Danny Baker bristol rovers = pathological liars. Lie about your fan base lie about your wealth lie about us to discredit us you even lie on your badge . Bristol rovers 1883 but you didn’t become brfc until 1899. Utter utter ***** Edited July 10, 2018 by steviestevieneville 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Army 75 Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 1 minute ago, steviestevieneville said: @Gashead1981 so the thread where your mate henbury gas lied about our club has been locked and nobodies allowed to mention it again . Do we get a apology ? Do you lot call him out as billy bullshit which is what we all know he is ? Of course not. They will wrap him in cotton wall . And say don’t worry Henbury we know you’re telling the truth. That copper is a ted. ******* 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC11 Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Red Army 75 said: Of course not. They will wrap him in cotton wall . And say don’t worry Henbury we know you’re telling the truth. That copper is a ted. ******* Exactly this. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
54-46 Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 Am sure @JulieH will give her post match analysis in due course Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daored Posted July 10, 2018 Report Share Posted July 10, 2018 5 minutes ago, Gashead1981 said: As mods we had contact from HG this afternoon following his meeting with PC Julie and her colleague. They had HG request us moderate the thread as there were comments on there the police didn’t like and any further comments that were directed to PC Julie were likely to warrant them taking further action against the posters. The collective desicion was taken to lock the thread to protect anyone that felt the need to comment further and not HG. We have also been told the police will be in contact with both forums to make a statement on the matter. When that is I don’t know but I am sure PC Julie will be along here shortly to make a comment in an official capacity as your liaison officer. As regards the alleged claim made by HG, I am sure the statement the police will make will indeed settle the matter once and for all. And be proven to be bull shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.